Support Forums: Message List - Tomcat Performance Higher on Linux

Was X loaded on Linux or not?

Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:45:56 -0400

Whether it was loaded on Linux or not, huh? I think the resources wouldn't be free, but I'm not sure. I found this on Google hoping to find an answer to exactly that question.

Was X loaded on Linux or not?

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:42:34 -0500

I am just wondering if the Linux PC had X windows running (System Level 5 startup?) or was it turned off (System level 3 startup?)....

Tomcat performance experience

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:44:32 -0500

We once had a customer misunderstand the hardware specs, so they put 20Gb of RAM into it (when we really meant that 20Gb of disk would be good). If we could have used all that memory all content would have been completely cached at all...

Tomcat performance experience

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:52:34 -0500

We went even further: we designed the CMS and the Portal to cohoperate, so that almost 100% can be cached (even page content) and thus during peak load no disk access at all happens. When something is published from the CMS we do actively...

Tomcat performance experience

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:50:15 -0500

This is my experience as well, which I think explains how a dynamic system could provide better performance than a static one: it is easier to break pages up into pieces, large parts of which can be heavily cached (navigation, header,...

How Many Users Calculations

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:52 -0500

The comments about the performance of Windows/Linux are true with regards to the first test in which both virtual machines were memory limited. Once the memory limitation is removed, however, I do think that Linux shows a clear advantage. First, you...

Some naive people.

Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:08:04 -0500

Yes, but like I said:
I'm curious which benchmarks you are referring to. Other than the benchmarks paid for by Microsoft, they all seem to show .NET trailing Java.
Peace,Cameron Purdy

odd-looking throughput graph

Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:34:43 -0500
Hey, Mike, long time. Anyhow I was showing that throughput graph (first graph in the first paper) to some of the guys here trying to figure out what was going on. Someone suggested it might be re-allocation of Tomcat-internal containers. I'm...

Tomcat performance experience

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:44:13 -0500

mhh... we had similar tests with a large univeristy portal and Resin + Windows. However our tests showed that these results can only be reached for in-memory results (more precisely, with an high cached/non-cached page rate).
This...

Tomcat performance experience

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:10:57 -0500
mhh... we had similar tests with a large univeristy portal and Resin + Windows. However our tests showed that these results can only be reached for in-memory results (more precisely, with an high cached/non-cached page rate).
One interesting point are...

Tomcat performance experience

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:48:34 -0500
We recently launched a new website for a major Swedish government branch using our portal software and they did extensive performance testing as part of the acceptance tests. We reached about ~350.000 hits/hour/machine with response times < 1s. This...

Benchmarks at TheServerSide.net

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:23:13 -0500

You can find benchmarks on the TheServerSide.net website

Yes, but like I said:
I'm curious which benchmarks you are referring to. Other than the benchmarks paid for by Microsoft, they all seem to show .NET...

Benchmarks at TheServerSide.net

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:21:36 -0500

You can find benchmarks on the TheServerSide.net websiteNetanel
Do you trust lame TSS benchmarks ?

Benchmarks at TheServerSide.net

Sun, 08 Jan 2006 06:42:51 -0500
You can find benchmarks on the TheServerSide.net website

Netanel

Just to pay attention...

Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:48:57 -0500

When talking about performence of Tomcat and where it is better to run the server... just take a look at the benchmarks between .net and j2ee. Although I develop on J2ee, I realize all the good stuff is, for my opinion, in the .Net side....