Support Forums: Message List - JUnit 4.0 has been released http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 23 May 2013 08:10:39 -0400 methods to be run in a collection of full qualified method names http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 How can I specify the methods to be run in a collection of full qualified method names with this junit core extension ?

Abby - cfds specialist.

]]> Wed, 20 Apr 2011 03:55:21 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 03:55:21 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2011 03:55:21 -0400 Apr 20, 2011 abby lays 0 Test Data Construction: also possible with JUnit 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:09:25 -0500 Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:09:25 -0500 Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:09:25 -0500 Feb 27, 2006 Klaus Meffert 0 Sending Dynamic Parameter values http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:38:10 -0500 Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:38:10 -0500 Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:38:10 -0500 Feb 20, 2006 Naveen Gayar 0 JUnit 4.0 has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 I doubt it but can you tell javac not to include certain annotated methods?No, this would go against one of the major principles in Java: a Java program should always have the same behavior regardless of the environment in which...]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:46 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:46 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:56:46 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 Cedric Beust 1 JUnit 4.0 has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048
It would be cool to be able to have test methods alongside the real code without any TestCase extension, but only if they can be stripped out.

Why? Because the...]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:34:08 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:34:08 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:34:08 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 George Coller 2 Backward compatibility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Also, the benefit of moving on is not a benefit that pertains to clients; it pertains to developers. I single example. Using hibernate annotations ina project I saved a lot of time by not having to generate the mapping files. The mapping...]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:17:27 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:17:27 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:17:27 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 David McCoy 0 Test Data Construction http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048
Making sure that lots of test data for A and C stay in synch, especially after touching B.

We recognized the need for supplying data to our testcases, objects (in your example A, B and C) and setting up the...]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:46:19 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:46:19 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:46:19 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 Bjorn Granvik 0 > http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Also, I somehow, want to derive my test case class with
> junit TestCase class which I can effectively organize my
> suite.

What's the organizing has to do with extending the TestCase?]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:57:40 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:57:40 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:57:40 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 Yagiz Erkan 0 Backward compatibility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:54:54 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:54:54 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:54:54 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 Yagiz Erkan 0 But they dont compile on java1.4 no more, so broke gump http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:33:26 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:33:26 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:33:26 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 Steve Loughran 0 And that's better? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 That example doesn't seem much of an improvement over 3.8.1 test code.public void testSimpleAdd() {    Money m12CHF= new Money(12, "CHF");     Money m14CHF= new...]]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:29:05 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:29:05 -0500 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:29:05 -0500 Feb 17, 2006 chenggn 0 Test Data Construction http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Could you be more specific and explain what these two ends are?
Usually I have a client (say test case) A that executes methods of component B that depends on component C. C needs to return data that match parameters of A. So...]]> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:30:08 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:30:08 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:30:08 -0500 Feb 16, 2006 Jens Schumann 1 Backward compatibility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 the benefit of moving on is not a benefit that pertains to clients; it pertains to developers. I single example. Using hibernate annotations ina project I saved a lot of time by not having to generate the mapping files. The mapping files just...]]> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:48 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:48 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:59:48 -0500 Feb 16, 2006 Erick Dovale 1 Test Data Construction http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Cedric, correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't a Data Provider solve just one end of the problem only? Usually I have a hard time to provide the data in the way you described AND have my test dependency using exactly the same...]]> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:51:41 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:51:41 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:51:41 -0500 Feb 16, 2006 Cedric Beust 2 Backward compatibility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39048 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:50:21 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:50:21 -0500 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:50:21 -0500 Feb 16, 2006 Erick Dovale 3