<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Article: Migrating JDBC DAO to EJB3</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:06:06 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, to see my points, it is important to keep in mind<br>all the aspects of the little story I told.<br>1. Servlet and EJB in the same container<br>2. 99.99999999999999999999999% (or more) of EJB access<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;are made by servlet...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:52:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:52:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:52:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance?? AND easy to do</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I will not consider EJB3 and JSF as mature enough to go on production.</blockquote><br>EJB 3 isn't even out yet as a finished standard, so is not production ready.  However, JSF certainly is - I am using it for substantial...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:28:18 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:28:18 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:28:18 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Werner, I was surprised your comment.Maybe my post was not clear enough.<blockquote>You are mixing two things here, EJB session beans can be local or remotely called, in a local call the overhead of a session bean and a spring bean is pretty...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:29:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:29:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:29:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Werner Punz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance?? AND easy to do</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Damian, we are not living in the same world. I do projects that are going on production, I am not doing paperware.<blockquote>I do not see, how is EJB3 more complex than other enterprise technologies. Especially now with JSF you will just &quot;drag and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:45:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:45:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:45:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>bruno chevalier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Werner, I was surprised your comment.<br>Maybe my post was not clear enough.<blockquote>You are mixing two things here, EJB session beans can be local or remotely called, in a local call the overhead <br>of a session bean and a spring bean is pretty much...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:23:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:23:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:23:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>bruno chevalier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, a definition of enterprise technology here would help.Anyway,if <blockquote>Of course. First low of distribution: do not distribute. Who is saying otherwise???</blockquote>why wrap something in an EJB?</blockquote><br>1) wrapping by...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:06:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:06:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:06:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Migrating EJB3 to SDO</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Oracle has also <a href="http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/webservices/standards/sca/index.html" target="_blank">signed up</a> for <a href="http://www.codefutures.com/service-data-object" target="_blank">Service Data...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:16:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:16:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:16:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>PJ Murray</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, a definition of enterprise technology here would help.<br>Anyway,<br>if <blockquote>Of course. First low of distribution: do not distribute. Who is saying otherwise???</blockquote>why wrap something in an EJB ?<br><br>To be really access-technology...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:34:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:34:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:34:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance?? AND easy to do</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I do not see, how is EJB3 more complex than other enterprise technologies. Especially now with JSF you will just &quot;drag and drop&quot; your JSFs and S EJBs. A CRUD for single table is ready in 20 minutes.</blockquote>I fully...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:31:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:31:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:31:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance?? AND easy to do</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I do not see, how is EJB3 more complex than other enterprise technologies. Especially now with JSF you will just &quot;drag and drop&quot; your JSFs and S EJBs. A CRUD for single table is ready in 20 minutes.</blockquote><br>I fully agree...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:59:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:59:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:59:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>anthony patricio</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I do NOT understand your concern here and what you suggest as better option.</blockquote>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:35:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:35:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:35:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I believed that POJO was the acronym ofPlain Old Java Object and was typically used to qualifyJDO capability to persist objects without inheriting froma specific base class.</blockquote><br>I am saying that POJO looks like POJO just for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:26:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:26:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:26:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>0) Believe or not, EJBs are capable of local calls.</blockquote>Believe it or not - EJBS were not meant for local calls. Why would someone go thru EJBs just to make local VM calls. Thats the worst use of EJBS - to make...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:28:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:28:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:28:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>0) Believe or not, EJBs are capable of local calls.</blockquote>Believe it or not - EJBS were not meant for local calls. Why would someone go thru EJBs just to make local VM calls. Thats the worst use of EJBS - to make local...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:45:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:45:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:45:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39111</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>0) Believe or not, EJBs are capable of local calls.</blockquote>Believe it or not - EJBS were not meant for local calls. Why would someone go thru EJBs just to make local VM calls. Thats the worst use of EJBS - to make local...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:36:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:36:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:36:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

