<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Jason Hunter On XQuery</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:08:18 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Rule interchange is new</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree that rule interchange is new, but I'm not the meaning of this statement.<blockquote>Using a semWeb enabled Concept you would not need to implement this algorithm yourself. The depency would be specified as beeing Transitiv (using OWL). Quering...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oops typo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My definition of semantic web is a bit different than just adding rule based programming to the web. this isn't the W3C definition, but it's what I would like to see.</blockquote><br>True, the definition of the W3C goes a step forther. Having...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:40:11 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:40:11 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 04:40:11 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Andreakis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oops typo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>My understanding is that knowledge is parsed and/or defined by an RDF Graph, which is then used by RDFQuery or RDFrule to derive some conclusion. Given the knowledge is converted to a graph, I question the accuracy of the graph...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:15:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:15:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:15:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oops typo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My understanding is that knowledge is parsed and/or defined by an RDF Graph, which is then used by RDFQuery or RDFrule to derive some conclusion. Given the knowledge is converted to a graph, I question the accuracy of the graph produced and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:05:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:05:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:05:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Andreakis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oops typo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I just noticed a typo. I meant to say &quot;if I can't retract a fact.&quot;<br><br>From my very limited understanding, even within the knowledge base camp, the use of monotonic vs non-monotonic isn't clear. My impression is there's still a lot of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:04:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:04:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:04:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Keep it simple</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for pointing out the monotonic reasoning link, I have seen it before, but it just makes me think even between those contributing to the spec have different perspective. I read over the old page with Tim B Lee's quotes about semantic...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:57:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:57:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:57:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Andreakis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>recent presentation on RDF flaws</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Peter,<br><br>I guess we took over this thread ;).<br><br>Just a few quick points.<br><blockquote>I read over the old page with Tim B Lee's quotes about semantic web and I'm left more confused. He says the internet is an open world and therefore...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:05:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:05:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:05:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Calvin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>recent presentation on RDF flaws</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with many of your points, but here is the thing that confuses and irritates me. Many people debating RDF have different definitions of monotonic/non-monotonic logic within the RDF stack. I have a decent understanding of rule engines, pattern...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:38:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:38:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:38:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>recent presentation on RDF flaws</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I totally agree with you about a robust framework needing to handle both kinds of negation. I don't think rdf itself was ever intended as the full framework though. There is owl on top of rdf(s), which adds more expressiveness (some form of negation at...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:38:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:38:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:38:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Calvin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Think again</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Now that I have a better idea what you don't like about rdf, I don't know that I definitely disagree with you (about whether rdf should have been non-monotonic). My gut instinct though is that nonmonotonic reasoning belongs somewhere higher on Tim...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:08:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:08:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 05:08:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Calvin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>recent presentation on RDF flaws</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In case you haven't seen this presentation.<br><br><a href="http://www.ruleml.org/events/ruleswsw3c/RDF_RuleML_Interoperability_Talk.ppt" target="_blank">http://www.ruleml.org/events/ruleswsw3c/RDF_RuleML_Interoperability_Talk.ppt</a><br><br>or Google...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:11:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:11:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:11:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Think again</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>RDF spec clearly states it is based on Monotonoic reasoning. Therefore in my mind, RDF is based on closed world assumptions. </blockquote><br>That may be true in your mind, but it doesn't follow. More importantly, it isn't what...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:50:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:50:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:50:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Think again</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>RDF spec clearly states it is based on Monotonoic reasoning. Therefore in my mind, RDF is based on closed world assumptions. </blockquote><br>That may be true in your mind, but it doesn't follow. More importantly, it isn't what you originally...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:56:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:56:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:56:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Calvin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Think again</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Yeah, I've tried CWM a little, but not for a while. Despite the name, it does not assume a closed world. It's probably a confusing name, but <a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html#name" target="_blank">here is Tim Berners-Lee's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:24:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:24:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:24:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>13</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Have you tried CWM</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39368</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yeah, I've tried CWM a little, but not for a while. <br><br>Despite the name, it does not assume a closed world. It's probably a confusing name, but <a href="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html#name" target="_blank">here is Tim Berners-Lee's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:59:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:59:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:59:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Calvin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>14</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

