<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Comparing Web Frameworks: Seam and Stripes</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:17:15 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Comparing Web Frameworks: Seam and Stripes</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Wow.  Isnt there anything else for these talented developers to be working on besides frameworks?</blockquote>Absolutely. My day job involves working on software to expedite research into cancer and other diseases with a genetic...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:56:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:56:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:56:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>PJ Murray</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jdon Framework</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jdon Framework is the combination of Domain Drive Development( DDD Framework, such as Ruby on Rails) and Ioc/AOP components (such as Spring/HiveMind) . <br><br>Jdon Framework combines with rapidity and agility for your J2EE application architecture. and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:23:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:23:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:23:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>query weki</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Facets and &amp;quot;Procedural back-ends&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, I <i>certainly</i> don't advocate a procedure-only view of the world. But nowadays I see a healthy mix of procedures and objects being used. The reason, as stated previously, is that real-world systems involve people and people tend to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:34:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:34:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:34:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use Cases, Actors, MDA... the facets approach fit well !</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi Remi,We probably have different sorts of customers! To me, the use case often becomes a very detailed description of the expected customer experience. The operation of the UI is fundamental and though it involves object manipulation...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:03:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:03:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:03:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>blockquote&gt;Remember the problems many developers had (still have?) moving from a procedural way of thinking to an OO way</blockquote>Well, no offense, but that may be your case right now ;-PActually, executing actions is procedural (struts...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:29:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:29:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:29:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kit Davies</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Once again don't get me wrong : the use case is a cornerstone in development process (links with customer, per use-case validation, etc.) ! But that's precisely where facets excel ! Once again it's closer to OO semantics than page-building...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:15:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:15:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:15:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kit Davies</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, even the JSF cardemo, you have different types of cars, each with different features that need to be displayed.  So the Java model/negotiation layer can customize all of the controls and state on the fly from backing logic-- similar to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:29:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:29:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:29:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well yes, though I think tables and records are sufficiently familiar to the average end user from everyday use that it is not a problem presenting such in a UI.</blockquote>And it causes us endless problems.  People think they are familiar....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:05:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:05:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:05:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But as explained in the JSF tuto (which I dived into, contrary to what you think), and in general examples and code I could look at, it's very &quot;page-oriented&quot;. Just look at the nav... it looks like completely opposite to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:35:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:35:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:35:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I read about your Facets stuff when it was first mentioned on TSS, and what you are promoting,</blockquote><br>Promoting ? <br>I'm just sharing my own receipies.<br>No offense, but there's more politics around JSF, facelets etc. I think...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:55:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I read about your Facets stuff when it was first mentioned on TSS, and what you are promoting, I'm seeing others already develop this kind of solution; piggy backing on JSF's component model such that there is a middle negotiation as to what...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:19:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:19:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:19:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Huh? JSF isn't bound to any particular object model for invocation.  That's why you have Shale dialogs/whatever, Seam's IoC model, or even Spring beans.</blockquote><br>I don't get your point sorry, I was talking about an UI design...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:04:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:04:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:04:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Actually, executing actions is procedural (struts or webwork or JSF events), whereas facets executed on objects, handling polymorphism etc, is closer to OO semantics, and very easy to use when you &quot;think object&quot; from the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:33:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:33:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:33:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another Way Of Doing It ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well yes, though I think tables and records are sufficiently familiar to the average end user from everyday use that it is not a problem presenting such in a UI.</blockquote><br>Well, a collection of beans with properties is similar then....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:23:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:23:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:23:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>WebOnSwing</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39529</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>have u seen <a href="http://webonswing.sf.net" target="_blank">Web on Swing</a>?</blockquote><br>No I didn't know this. But as far as I understood from a quick browsing, it looks more like a &quot;rich-client building platform&quot; than real...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:08:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:08:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:08:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

