<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Mustang (1.6) versus Tiger (1.5) Performance Comparison</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:40:29 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>we use Sun 1.6 in production...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Because it is just so much faster, and is actually more stable than 1.5. I think the 40-100% speed improvement is accurate. Not that 1.6 doesn't have its problems, but almost all are problems that 1.5 has. Latency for making socket connections is a big...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 13:01:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 13:01:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 13:01:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 5, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Seline</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[thanks for the detailed response :)<br><br>Once I finish my rule engine, I'm gonna have to hook it up to coherence and try it out on a few systems.<br><br>peter]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:58:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:58:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:58:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Coherence proves the same problem can be solve with different techniques. Makes me wonder how &quot;hard&quot; it would be for a C++ guru to duplicate coherence performance. Since I know close to nothing about writing high performance C++...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:50:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:50:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:50:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Interesting</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[thanks for playing along, since I had no clue.<br><blockquote><blockquote>Coherence proves the same problem can be solve with different techniques. Makes me wonder how &quot;hard&quot; it would be for a C++ guru to duplicate coherence performance. Since...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:55:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:55:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:55:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Coherence proves the same problem can be solve with different techniques. Makes me wonder how &quot;hard&quot; it would be for a C++ guru to duplicate coherence performance. Since I know close to nothing about writing high performance C++...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:52:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:52:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:52:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I was thinking of a very specific case where the server needs to load 5Gb+ of data into memory and execute queries within 50ms. Doing that in Java in this specific case could be pain for very painful. Considering 32bit JVM can't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:37:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:37:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:37:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The JVMs I tested all had significantly larger response times due to the garbage collection. With a 5GB heap I would expect a dropout for at least (probably much more) 1 second when a full garbage collection runs.</blockquote><br>Without...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:51:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:51:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:51:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I was thinking of a very specific case where the server needs to load 5Gb+ of data into memory and execute queries within 50ms. Doing that in Java in this specific case could be pain for very painful. Considering 32bit JVM can't do it and I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:50:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:50:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:50:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The JVMs I tested all had significantly larger response times due to the garbage collection. With a 5GB heap I would expect a dropout for at least (probably much more) 1 second when a full garbage collection runs. This depends on the number of objects....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:39:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:39:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:39:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Haug B?rger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Writing high performance apps is no easier in Java though and in cases where a developer has the skills to optimize at the low level, java becomes a barrier.If some had the C++ skills, they would be crazy to go with Java.</i><br><br>Then I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:57:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:57:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:57:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>java should be faster than c++ then?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Games in Java? Take a look at this: <a href="http://www.lwjgl.org/projects.php" target="_blank">http://www.lwjgl.org/projects.php</a><br><br>One that should be highlighted in that list is TribalTrouble, which won a prize for best (RTS?) game somewhere on...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:42:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:42:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:42:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>java should be faster than c++ then?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>To be fair, I could never see Java becoming the language of choice of games developers. It's just too slow for the type of 3D FPS stuff that is the most popular genre. Sure, theoretically it's fast enough, but empirically it would seem that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:34:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:34:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:34:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Schanberger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>java should be faster than c++ then?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Second, to my knowledge, there aren't any Java based libraries for things like DirectX, so that alone would prevent Tim Sweeney from considering Java, I'll bet. I mean, since DirectX doesn't work on anything but Windows, the question wouldn't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:27:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:27:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:27:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rory Winston</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>java should be faster than c++ then?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Malloc/free are really kind of crappy and in many cases, especially for applications with long process lifetimes (this IS &quot;the server side&quot;) where heap fragmentation can take place.</blockquote><br>Having written many...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:24:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:24:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 08:24:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tero Vaananen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I would agree for C++ experts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39602</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<i>Writing high performance apps is no easier in Java though and in cases where a developer has the skills to optimize at the low level, java becomes a barrier.<br><br>If some had the C++ skills, they would be crazy to go with Java.</i><br><br>Then I am...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:43:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:43:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:43:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

