<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Groovy on Rails (Grails) 0.1 Released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:30:11 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Bambi meets Godzilla - Croquet 1.0 is here</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Well it took Java at least 6-7 years to reach the richness of Smalltalk's tooling, and yet that didn't stop people adopting it.</blockquote>It stopped me, and (I suspect) plenty of others.  Until Java had decent performance and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:32:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:32:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:32:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Bambi meets Godzilla</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote> There is an obvious portability advantage.Also, how long do you think it is going to take for the richness of Java's tooling, libraries and frameworks to be implemented in native Ruby?</blockquote>Well it took Java at least 6-7...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:28:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:28:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:28:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Bambi meets Godzilla</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> There is an obvious portability advantage.Also, how long do you think it is going to take for the richness of Java's tooling, libraries and frameworks to be implemented in native Ruby?</blockquote>Well it took Java at least 6-7 years to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:09:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:09:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:09:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Bambi versus Godzilla</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There are at least 4 new Ruby books in the pipeline this year and more scheduled. The pragmatic programmers are doing a very good job at marketing Ruby.</blockquote><br>I'm not so sure.  Have a look at the TIOBE index.  Ruby barely...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:35:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:35:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 02:35:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Bambi versus Godzilla</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Steve,<br><br>Came across this blog entry and thought you and others would find it very interesting:<br><br><a href="http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/blog-rants/bambi-meets-godzilla.html"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 05:33:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 05:33:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 05:33:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 16, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Customer Collaboration - It's your call</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Someone on the team needs a deep understanding of the entire picture.  That's my job.</blockquote><br>Understood. Sounds like the programmer who goes off and works with the end-users for a week or two to gain their perspective.<br><br>It...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:40:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:40:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:40:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Customer Collaboration</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm not knocking what you are doing, I'm just saying that with more collaboration with the customer/end users things could be a whole lot better. The problem though is getting them to commit the time to work with you right? (I know even with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:25:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:25:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:25:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Business Value</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[blockquote&gt;I think failure to take responsibility for the business value delivered by an application and it's lifecycle costs is a cop-out.I agree with agile methods for working on the details, but an application's mission should be defined from the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:42:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:42:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:42:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Business Value</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A pragmatic way forward, but it is worth remembering that you are not the business,</blockquote><br>I am not the business, but I am part of it.<br><blockquote>and if you take on the responsibility for defining what's need then it follows that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:40:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:40:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:40:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But isn't ROR rehashing lots of old ideas?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote> You think you should stick to the XP principle that future use of code is inappropriate.A fair summary?</blockquote>You got me mostly right. As I understand it XP says design for today refactor for tomorrow. This works if your...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:30:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:30:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:30:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But isn't ROR rehashing lots of old ideas?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> You think you should stick to the XP principle that future use of code is inappropriate.A fair summary?</blockquote>You got me mostly right. As I understand it XP says design for today refactor for tomorrow. This works if your code today is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:10:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:10:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:10:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But isn't ROR rehashing lots of old ideas?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi Steve, Thanks for clearing things up. I think I understand your point of view much better now.BTW the component model I was refering to was EJB.Cheers,Paul.</blockquote><br>I know :)  It is a shame that Java has been tarnished by EJB for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:04:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:04:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:04:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But isn't ROR rehashing lots of old ideas?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Steve, <br><br>Thanks for clearing things up. I think I understand your point of view much better now.<br><br>BTW the component model I was refering to was EJB.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Paul.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:29:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:29:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:29:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But isn't ROR rehashing lots of old ideas?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>blockquote&gt;I tend to agree.  It is just that we disagree about <i>which simple and productive technologies to use</i>.I use primarily Java, JDO and JSF(+facelets).  I get fast development, rapid response to changes, fast development, and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:43:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:43:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:43:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Business Value</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39696</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Rather than asking users to guess what will add value, we deliver what they see as their highest priority needs and allow them to use it. </blockquote>User perceived value and business value, IMHO, are only weakly correlated....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:35:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:35:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:35:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

