<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:02:10 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Tim,This is not a problem of Eclipse being obstructive to an otherwise well-supported Java standard. Eclipse will implement JSR 198 if there is a clear market demand for it.The problem is this: who will develop their plugins against the JSR...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:59:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:59:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 11:59:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tim Fennell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Tim,<br><br>This is not a problem of Eclipse being obstructive to an otherwise well-supported Java standard. Eclipse will implement JSR 198 if there is a clear market demand for it.<br><br>The problem is this: who will develop their plugins against the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 08:36:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 08:36:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 08:36:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Neil Bartlett</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A: Which IDEs will implement this?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The question remains: which IDEs will implement this specification, and why?</blockquote><br>Well Oracle JDeveloper already supports this JSR.<br>I think it will be in the best of intrest of both Netbeans and IntelliJ to implement the JSR as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:04:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>shay shmeltzer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the idea is great. Very ambitious so yeah, it remains to be seen what the net result would be. But I'd sure like to be able to write plugins once and run them in several IDEs. Even if it would work for, say, 30% of common plugins, it would be a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:22:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:22:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:22:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Very POOR API</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[yes it is!<br>after many years and a couple of opensource IDEs available,this spec does not provide enough functionality to write real world plugin<br>from the begining:<br>it does not support a well defined plugin lifecycle and notification...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fawzyj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't see the standard extension API as being practical for Eclipse until there's a Swing/SWT bridge that produces components that look native to SWT.  One of the things that I find irritating is plugins that are just a thin layer of code interfacing...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:15:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:15:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 17:15:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Dean</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I would love for this specification to be a success, but frankly I just don't see it happening.  I'm an IntelliJ IDEA user.  I use it because I think it's the best IDE out there.<br><br>IMHO the only advantage Eclipse has (other than price  - but $500...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:12:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:12:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:12:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tim Fennell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Standard Extension API for IDEs (JSR 198) finalized</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40346</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr198/index.html" target="_blank">JSR-198</a>, the Standard Extension API for Integrated Development Environments, has been finalized. The specification is available for download from the JCP....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:16:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:16:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:16:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

