<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:35:55 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>The problem with @Create</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The problem I have with the @Create annotation is that it isn't possible to understand by itself. The case in dwr.xml is different, because there you have a context. The  element in dwr.xml can be understood by the fact that it exists in the dwr.xml...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:38:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:38:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:38:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 4, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mats Henricson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Here is my proposal</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi!<br><br>I think it is better to have annotations look like this:<br><br>@DWRClass(create=session)<br>public class RemoteFunctions {<br>    @RemoteMethod<br>    public int calculateFoo() {<br>       return 42;<br>    }<br>}<br><br>If none...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:06:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:06:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:06:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 4, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Walker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Here is my proposal</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi!...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 04:26:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 04:26:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 04:26:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 31, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mats Henricson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: I think...declarative is not what annotations are</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarative_programming" target="_newWindow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declarative_programming</a>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:15:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:15:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:15:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Constance Eustace</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[dwr.xml support is still available, and I have to say prefered by me because it is a central audit point that helps security....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 11:11:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 11:11:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 11:11:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Walker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: I think...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>1) I hate annotations, it is configuration inside of code, thus preventing the changing of configuration without compilation<br></blockquote><br><br>On the whole I think there are two types of uses for annotations. The first is as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 10:24:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 10:24:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 10:24:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexandre Poitras</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: I think...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1) I hate annotations, it is configuration inside of code, thus preventing the changing of configuration without compilation<br></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:53:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:53:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 06:53:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Phil Zoio</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: I think...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1) I hate annotations, it is configuration inside of code, thus preventing the changing of configuration without compilation</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 19:15:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 19:15:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 19:15:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Angeles</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Implementation could be cleaner</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[While I like this idea, the implementation seems like it could be better. If I choose to use DWR annotations, I still have to specify which classes are annotated in web.xml.  One of the reasons folks like annotations is because they give you better...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:08:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:08:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:08:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mraible</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with Henrique's point...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:15:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:15:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:15:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gary bogachkov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: I think...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1) I hate annotations, it is configuration inside of code, thus preventing the changing of configuration without compilation<br><br>2) This is a good use of annotations, as annotations were intended for use<br><br>3) I love DWR, at least...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:39:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:39:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:39:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Walker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>First, why 2 different annotations (@create and @convert) for similar results?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:36:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:36:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:36:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Walker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[First, why 2 different annotations (@create and @convert) for similar results?

Second, aren't these 2 annotation names too short/simple, with a much higher risk of name clashing with other annotation libraries?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:02:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:02:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:02:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I think...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[1) I hate annotations, it is configuration inside of code, thus preventing the changing of configuration without compilation...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:45:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:45:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:45:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Constance Eustace</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>DWR 2.0M2 adds annotation support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40665</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Continuing the wave of annotation support for developers from all kinds of libraries, Maik Schreiber has has added <a href="http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/server/annotations">annotation support</a> to <a href="http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/">DWR</a>, which...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:11:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:11:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:11:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>14</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

