<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Lucene 2.0, search library, released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:12:44 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Good news , now have to update Red-Piranha</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Good news from Lucene , now have to update <a href="http://red-piranha.sourceforge.net">Red-Piranha</a> which is based on it ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:29:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:29:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:29:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>paul browne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Ignoring backward-compatibility = Unrealistic programming</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[At what point should the industry move forward then? If no library moves to Java 5, then what will be the incentive to start using Java5 on a server platform?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:59:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:59:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:59:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Martijn Dashorst</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Ignoring backward-compatibility = Unrealistic programming</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just want to say, many "old-timers" (like me) have to deal with applications that run on JDK 1.3, 1.4. All those using J2EE 1.3 containers, all those using WebSphere 5.x, all those using Tomcat 4.x,... That means if an enhancement of a common API cannot...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 05:26:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 05:26:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 05:26:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 31, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hue Cheng</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[However, if you do feel inclined to use annotations, check out <a href="http://mojodna.net/searchable/">Searchable</a> (which will work with Lucene 2.0 in the next release, as well as incorporate some locking/performance optimizations).]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:42:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:42:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:42:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Seth Fitzsimmons</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: congrats</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[maybe a little misunderstanding here. of course it can be used in Java 5 apps. What i meant was to use it in the developement of the Lucene. i dont think Java5 is only about annotations and generic constructs. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:59:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:59:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:59:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ahmet a</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: congrats</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for the release. Lucene is great. However, i wished it would use-require Java 5 instead. previous versions are good enough for old-timers. :P</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:31:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:31:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 11:31:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>congrats</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the release. Lucene is great. However, i wished it would use-require Java 5 instead. previous versions are good enough for old-timers. :P]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:34:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:34:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:34:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ahmet a</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Lucene 2.0, search library, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I love that library, it works like a charm. I'll have to try the newest version.

cheers,
Stephane Vaucher
p.s. I would hope it's not fully compatible, it is after all a new **major** version.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:37:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:37:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:37:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephane Vaucher</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Lucene 2.0, search library, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40698</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html">Lucene 2.0</a> has been released. The change from Lucene 1.9 is relatively small, with mostly bug fixes being applied; however, the deprecated methods and classes have been removed with one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:18:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:18:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 09:18:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

