<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - How to tune Apache ActiveMQ</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:20:18 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[James,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:32:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:32:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:32:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roland Altenhoven</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>The performance tuning guide was the first of hopefully many articles and best practice guides.<br><br>James<br><a href="http://logicblaze.com/">LogicBlaze</a><br>Fuse: Open Source SOA</blockquote><br><br>Please can I ask, which...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:53:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:53:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:53:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The performance tuning guide was the first of hopefully many articles and best practice guides.<br><br>James<br><a href="http://logicblaze.com/">LogicBlaze</a><br>Fuse: Open Source SOA</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:01:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:01:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:01:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roland Altenhoven</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>James, <br><br>Thank you for the links, which add to my collection of bits and pieces :) <br><br>Open source products and commercial startups suffer the same disease: lack of "best practices" writeups. I've been attending  a training on one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:57:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:57:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:57:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[James, ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:44:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:44:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:44:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yakov Fain</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[On First, I think many Open Source Solutions are more "professional products" in the areas functionally, quality, documentation and support - as some others, provided by business manufacturer....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:01:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:01:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:01:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roland Altenhoven</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I guess, this is the difference between the open source and professional products. The OS vendors assume that experienced developers will eventually figure it out, which is true if your project really depends on this software.<br><br>My case...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:55:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:55:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:55:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not bits and pieces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I guess, this is the difference between the open source and professional products. The OS vendors assume that experienced developers will eventually figure it out, which is true if your project really depends on this software....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:37:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:37:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:37:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yakov Fain</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The larger picture</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[(Sorry in advance if my response isn't snippy enough.)  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:50:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:50:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:50:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Peters</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Any tutorial on Tomcat/ActiveMQ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The following Tomcat instructions are not a step-by-step tutorial for beginners. But I think, really interesting people can found many helpful informations by a look to the extended document-site of ActiveMQ and their associated mailing-lists....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:38:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:38:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:38:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roland Altenhoven</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Any tutorial on Tomcat/ActiveMQ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Before even trying to fine tune ActiveMQ, I guess, one would need to configure Tomcat with Active MQ :)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:48:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:48:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:48:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 18, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yakov Fain</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How to tune solutions for Business Process Integration ...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In my personal experience is Apache ActiveMQ a good and stable solution which provides high performance messaging and is darkly integrated in ServiceMix - one of the ESB Solutions from Apache with functionally support for the JBI-Standard (Java Business...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:05:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:05:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 04:05:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 17, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roland Altenhoven</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>... and why not write your own VM and OS while you are at it...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>... I guess what I'm asking is, if you don't care about the ACID-ness of JMS, why not just use IP multicast and bypass the message broker all together?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:12:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:12:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:12:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tatu Saloranta</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How to tune Apache ActiveMQ</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'd be curious to know if users consider these 'real' options relative to how they use JMS...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:03:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:03:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:03:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How to tune Apache ActiveMQ</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=40951</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'd be curious to know if users consider these 'real' options relative to how they use JMS. I've used JMS for some time now and never in a situation where duplicate delivery was acceptable let alone any sort of potential message loss as is possible with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:20:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:20:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:20:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Onnen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

