Support Forums: Message List - Advanced Message Queue Protocol Released http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 26 May 2013 01:00:09 -0400 Re: AMQP is a Client-to-Broker protocol http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008
But none of this can happen unless people like those on the TSS community "get it" and are supportive enough to move forwards with this.


Wouldn't buyin from the major vendors (IBM, etc.) help as well?...]]> Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:54:51 -0400 Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:54:51 -0400 Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:54:51 -0400 Jun 22, 2006 James Watson 0 Re: RE: I'd have thought there'd be a JMS provider turn... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 >> I'd have thought there'd be a JMS provider turn up at some point which implements AMQP so no, JMS should be all you need on the Java platform.

I agree with you on this one.

All major JMS providers already provide...]]> Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:50:14 -0400 Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:50:14 -0400 Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:50:14 -0400 Jun 22, 2006 James Watson 0 Exactly! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 This is the kind of convergence you need for SOA to take hold without fear of vendor lockin, and to allow that market to blossom and reach its potential....]]> Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:32:28 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:32:28 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:32:28 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 Mike Herrick 0 Re: Unless of course you want to do pub/sub http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:32:12 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:32:12 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:32:12 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 peter lin 0 Re: AMQP is a Client-to-Broker protocol http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 But none of this can happen unless people like those on the TSS community "get it" and are supportive enough to move forwards with this. Wouldn't buyin from the major vendors (IBM, etc.) help as well? ]]> Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:42 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:42 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:01:42 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 traceroute 1 Of course connecting brokers... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:40:27 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:40:27 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:40:27 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 John O'Hara 0 AMQP is a Client-to-Broker protocol http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:36:26 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:36:26 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:36:26 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 John O'Hara 4 Unless of course you want to do pub/sub http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 I know many financial firms use MQSeries because other messaging systems don't come close. If this gains momentum and open source provides comparable reliability, scalability and throughput, it's going to get harder for IBM and Tibco....]]> Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:38:03 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:38:03 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 05:38:03 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 Mike Herrick 1 Re: If this gains momentum http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 I know many financial firms use MQSeries because other messaging systems don't come close. If this gains momentum and open source provides comparable reliability, scalability and throughput, it's going to get harder for IBM and Tibco....]]> Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:33:52 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:33:52 -0400 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 03:33:52 -0400 Jun 21, 2006 Roland Altenhoven 0 Re: RE: I'd have thought there'd be a JMS provider turn... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:33:52 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:33:52 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:33:52 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 John Davies 0 Interoperability between messaging engines http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:23:12 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:23:12 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:23:12 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 Ghanshyam Patel 5 RE: I'd have thought there'd be a JMS provider turn... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008
I'd have thought there'd be a JMS provider turn up at some point which implements AMQP so no, JMS should be all you need on the Java platform.
...]]> Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:14:56 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:14:56 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:14:56 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 Gautam Tandon 8 If this gains momentum http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:41:25 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:41:25 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:41:25 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 peter lin 3 Re: Advanced Message Queue Protocol Released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Very interesting. JP Morgan Chase is the first name on the list. It actually is a "user". IBM, as a big "provider" is missing...

From the news, it seems this is a communication protocol for underlying mechanism. Any impact to existing...]]> Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:16:32 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:16:32 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:16:32 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 James Strachan 9 Re: Advanced Message Queue Protocol Released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41008 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:13:05 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:13:05 -0400 Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:13:05 -0400 Jun 20, 2006 Wei Jiang 10