<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Article: Binding XML to Java</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:05 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: EMF &amp;#38; FpML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[My goal scenario was being able to author industry standard XSD in eCore. That way eCore becomes the primary artefact and the XSD is generated, rather than the other way round as it is today.

Thanks for the link. I'm watching it.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:57:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:57:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:57:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matthew Rawlings</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: EMF &amp;#38; FpML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Matthew,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:36:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:36:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:36:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 29, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EMF &amp;#38; FpML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I tried to use EMF for the FpML schema. It didn't work out, there were unsupported XML Schema features....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:22:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:22:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:22:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matthew Rawlings</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How is XML Beans different or better?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Our conclusion is that all the XML binding solutions produce roughly similar APIs and that from this perspective there is little in the way of differeniating them.  So I'm not the least bit surprised that there's nothing compelling to make you switch....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:20:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:20:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:20:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EMF supports Java -&amp;gt; Ecore -&amp;gt; XML Schema</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[EMF will also generate a schema starting just with annotated Java, but the more I explain, the more complex it will all seem.  Like beauty, simplicity is in the eye of the beholder...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:11:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:11:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:11:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XML without a schema is just syntax without semantics</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't understand how one derives meaning from arbitrary unconstrained syntax?  (Perhaps I'm being a philosopher again.) I would argue as well that our industry in its relentless drive toward simplicity seems to end up with more and more complexity...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:03:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:03:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:03:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XML Beans verses EMF: Apples and Oranges</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[As Steve Punte points out, EMF applies to a much broader domain of problems than just XML binding.  So while I won't claim EMF is head an shoulders above the other XML binding solutions, it seems fair to claim it's far more generally applicable and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:53:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:53:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:53:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EMF Provides Common API for XML and non-XML binding</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[EMF provides exactly what you are describing.  This article merely focuses on the XML support because that seems to be the cat's meow for so many people at the moment and is particularly relevant to the community at this site.  But you can start with a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:42:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:42:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:42:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A model of a model is a model</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I find a seemingly shallow comment like this most disappointing.  The statement "<i>In the universe of all models, the simplest self describing model plays a singularly unique role as the one model that binds all other models.</i>" would belong in a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:29:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:29:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:29:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EMF's XML support covers most aspects of XML Schema</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[- EMF does support xsd:any and xsd:anyAttribue, including both lax and strict processing....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:16:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:16:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:16:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EMF Goes Beyond XML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[EMF is intended to deal with data from any source, not just XML, so while it may be complex by comparison, it also deals with a broader domain and unifies them under a single umbrella.  E.g., <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.elver.org/"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:14:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:14:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:14:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ed Merks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Article claims to compare to XMLBeans...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[...then the authors just dropped the ball.

I see nothing compelling in the article to make me switch from XMLBeans.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:24:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:24:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:24:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chad Bradley</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>too complex</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There is way too much in this explanation for it to be a good solution when you consider that there is a much simpler way to do this.  The problem I have found with most binding frameworks is that the mapping is done on the Java side or by using some...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:05:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:05:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:05:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JAXB 2.0 vs JiBX</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes it does! :O...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:09:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:09:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:09:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Gulliksen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>VTD-XML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41618</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[XML is in many cases not bound to any schemas, VTD-XML...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:05:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:05:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 17:05:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 5, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jimmy Zhang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

