Support Forums: Message List - EJB3 and Custom Types http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:27:06 -0400 Re: EJB3 and Custom Types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:38:05 -0400 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:38:05 -0400 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:38:05 -0400 Sep 21, 2009 daringtakers 0 Was it my post? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41833...]]> Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:34:16 -0400 Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:34:16 -0400 Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:34:16 -0400 Sep 3, 2006 Gili _ 0 Re: EJB3 tooling http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886
great support in tools, good support from your appserver vendor, lower cost of switching to another implementation etc.

Petr, which tool do you have in mind? I am currently looking into the free offerings (Eclipse...]]> Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:07:53 -0400 Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:07:53 -0400 Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:07:53 -0400 Aug 26, 2006 Petr Jiricka 0 EJB3 tooling http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 great support in tools, good support from your appserver vendor, lower cost of switching to another implementation etc....]]> Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:29:47 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:29:47 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:29:47 -0400 Aug 25, 2006 Christian Sell 1 Re: specification vs. product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 Is JPA a premature standard? Possibly. ...]]> Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:56:53 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:56:53 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:56:53 -0400 Aug 25, 2006 Petr Jiricka 2 Re: Mapping spatial types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 TopLink obviously offers more built-in support for Oracle-specific features (including spatial, historical querying, VPD, Oracle hints, etc. etc) than other products, but that is not really the point, just another product pitch......]]> Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:01:14 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:01:14 -0400 Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:01:14 -0400 Aug 25, 2006 Magnus Heino 0 Re: EJB3 and Custom Types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:47:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:47:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:47:15 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Erik Bengtson 0 Re: specification vs. product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886
But my advice to anyone involved would be to stick to the lowest common denominator amongst the already successful ORM solutions and don't try and specify anything that is still unproven.

Paul, I dont know how much...]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:11:51 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Paul Beckford 0 Re: specification vs. product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 But my advice to anyone involved would be to stick to the lowest common denominator amongst the already successful ORM solutions and don't try and specify anything that is still unproven....]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:42:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:42:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:42:15 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Christian Sell 1 Re: specification vs. product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886
Bill, the purpose of a specification is to standardize a technology or API in such a way that I can happily program against it and switch implementations anytime.


+1...]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:44:07 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:44:07 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:44:07 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Paul Beckford 5 Re: Mapping spatial types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886
I thought that JDO specifically prohibited non-specified system-defined classes from being persistent fields, but I may have misinterpreted something I read in the spec

Nothing of the sort. JDO(2) explicitly says...]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:58:26 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:58:26 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:58:26 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Mike Keith 0 open discussion http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:32:48 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:32:48 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:32:48 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Christian Sell 0 Re: Mapping spatial types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:25:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:25:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:25:15 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Joseph Ottinger 1 Re: Mapping spatial types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 I thought that JDO specifically prohibited non-specified system-defined classes from being persistent fields, but I may have misinterpreted something I read in the spec...]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:01:14 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:01:14 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:01:14 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Andy Jefferson 1 Re: Mapping spatial types http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41886 JPA provides no provision for specifics like spatial types. Such support is vendor-specific with what they have defined in JPA.
In case it's of use to you, JPOX provides a significant proportion of what you mention out of the box with no...]]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:20:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:20:15 -0400 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:20:15 -0400 Aug 24, 2006 Mike Keith 3