Support Forums: Message List - GemFire 5.0, distributed operational data store for scalability http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 23 May 2013 04:51:08 -0400 Re: GemFire & Partitioned Caching, etc. http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 GemFire's API is indeed more expansive than what I've heard about Tangosol's, but the reason is (for the most part) because there are many more options available for a more diverse set of use-cases. One example is the creation of new data in...]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:48:03 -0400 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:48:03 -0400 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:48:03 -0400 Sep 18, 2006 Cameron Purdy 0 GemFire & Partitioned Caching, etc. http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 split data accross multiple caches using a very clever hashing algorithm along with its ability to provide a configurable guarantee on availability. The upshot of this is that you can store a lot more data in memory than you can place in a...]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:21:49 -0400 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:21:49 -0400 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:21:49 -0400 Sep 18, 2006 Gideon Low 1 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 How does GemFire compare with Tangosol Coherence? Can I plug GemFire as a Hibernate cache?...]]> Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:06:39 -0400 Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:06:39 -0400 Sat, 16 Sep 2006 07:06:39 -0400 Sep 16, 2006 Howard Henson 2 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 In the interest of keeping this thread factually accurate, I would suggest you stick to just Tangosol/Coherence marketing and not traffic into gemStone's pedigree or the origins of GemFire...]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:32:17 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:32:17 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:32:17 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Cameron Purdy 0 Re: what are you using to achieve recovery + rel. multicasting? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 I like the idea of publishers and non-publishers, but it might not work in all situations, for example HTTP session replication where anyone can be publisher.

Reading your post, it seems like you might be using JGroups to provide some...]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:15:47 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:15:47 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:15:47 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Jags Ramnarayan 0 Re: what are you using to achieve recovery + rel. multicasting? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:35:02 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:35:02 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:35:02 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Galder Zamarre??o 1 Re: what are you using to achieve recovery and reliable multicasting http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 You also me mention that Reliable Multicasting with UDP, how are you achieving this and recovery from network failures and network partitioning?...]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:53:57 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:53:57 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:53:57 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Jags Ramnarayan 2 For those who have no money http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Guglielmo Lichtner 0 what are you using to achieve recovery and reliable multicasting http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:55:46 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:55:46 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:55:46 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Galder Zamarre??o 3 Open Source vs. Vendors in Data Fabric space. http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 Make your software and we'll decide if you deserve praise.

Coherence is nice and way overpriced.

GemStone is nice and way overpriced.

BTW, distributed Maps, no matter how many partitioning features you provide, aren't...]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:53:02 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:53:02 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:53:02 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Gideon Low 0 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161
AFAIK, Gemstone ported their object database to C++ in the 1990s, and used that as the basis for an interesting J2EE server back in 1999 or so, which in turn evolved into Gemfire.



Cameron,
In the...]]> Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:24:33 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:24:33 -0400 Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:24:33 -0400 Sep 14, 2006 Christopher Stach II 1 Is GemFire easy to use and operationally ready? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 In the case of Gemstone, they have been in business for 25 years or so, and they focused on a Smalltalk object database (Object Oriented Database Management System, or OODBMS), and I have heard that the Smalltalk product is pretty good....]]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:14:37 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:14:37 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:14:37 -0400 Sep 13, 2006 Jags Ramnarayan 0 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161
How does GemFire compare with Tangosol Coherence?


I have never seen GemFire, so I can't personally describe any pros and cons in reference to it.

However, it is clear that the various products in this...]]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:29:02 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:29:02 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 16:29:02 -0400 Sep 13, 2006 Bharath Rangarajan 3 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 How does GemFire compare with Tangosol Coherence?...]]> Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:36 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:36 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:40:36 -0400 Sep 13, 2006 Cameron Purdy 5 Re: Coherence? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42161 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:32:42 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:32:42 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:32:42 -0400 Sep 13, 2006 Bharath Rangarajan 4