<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Closures without Complexity</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:27:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Lack of new ??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I kinda like the idea, but, like Lars on the InfoQ thread, find the lack of 'new' disturbing.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:11:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:11:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:11:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jerome Lacoste</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>My 2 cents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/10/11/why-i-think-cice-is-more-complex-than-necessary/" target="_newWindow">http://www.digizenstudio.com/blog/2006/10/11/why-i-think-cice-is-more-complex-than-necessary/</a>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:47:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:47:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:47:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jing Xue</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>closures</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA["Therefore, we further propose allowing such access if the local variables in question are explicitly declared public"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:06:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:06:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:06:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Campbell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Little closure sample</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One point is here that for only adding up a number to a list of numbers is so trivial you wouldn't create an anonymous inner class or create a new method.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:22:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:22:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:22:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Little closure sample</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hello,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:34:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:34:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:34:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Oliver Plohmann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: syntax sugar</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>An upshot of the 'final' requirement is that it encourages anonymous class implementations not to change method-local state.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:25:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:25:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:25:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 12, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: syntax sugar</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I do find the "final" requirement annoying however...</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:34:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:34:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:34:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I hope it works out</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hello Oliver,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:27:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:27:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:27:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Holloway</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>syntax sugar</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The examples in this thread are in my opinion not that insightful as they use closures to solve problems for which access to the outer scope is not needed. This makes people believe that closures are only about syntactic sugar.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:06:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:06:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:06:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Is this really necessary?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Oh, it sure does. Type<br>Runnable r = new <br>and IDEA offers you all available classes (and interfaces) implementing Runnable</blockquote>

Damn.  I was using ctrl-space, not ctrl-shift-space.  Thanks.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:34:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:34:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:34:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>static typing maks closures syntax intricate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Bill,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:26:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:26:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:26:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Oliver Plohmann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Is this really necessary?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In Eclipse, when I type Runnable runnable=, one of the options is a template for a Runnable anonymous class.  But that's a hard-coded one, it doesn't work for arbitrary interfaces.  IDEA doesn't do that.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:02:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:02:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:02:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jens Voss</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Give it up, Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Java is too verbose for closures.  Regardless of what anyone comes up with in java, it will never beat expressions like

sockets do: [:sock | sock isConnected ifTrue: [sock close]].

One line -- One line of code for that.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:08:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:08:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:08:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Holloway</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Say goodbye to anonymous class</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[glad to see Java finally catch up on this....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:52:29 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:52:29 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 23:52:29 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ben Yu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Is this really necessary?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42535</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why do we need this.  What is so hard to understand about the first code extract.  With modern IDE's which are able to automatically generate stub implementations of interfaces is it really necessary to accomodate programming constructs such...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:59:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:59:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:59:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 10, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gustavo Santucho</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

