<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Gosling: a build process that uses Java instead of XML</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:50:00 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java to build Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>It looks like a way of using the java language to build a java project.<br><br>What we need is a more consise way to describe the build without having the java language/syntax get in the way.<br><br>Maybe sone kind of build...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:24:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:24:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:24:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 30, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maurizio De Cecco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Gant!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>well, all right Gant seems nice  but author's point is to leverage Java knowledge.. That is why i liked it. But tool support might be an issue for both projects.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:39:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Russel Winder</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Still writing Ant build file ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The aim of the build framework EL4ant <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://el4ant.sourceforge.net/" target="_newWindow">http://el4ant.sourceforge.net/</a> is to provide a simple and really fast build system for your multi-component projects. You...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:14:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:14:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:14:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yves Martin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Maven 2 is ready</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Maven 2 is ready, has been ready for some time, if you can't figure it out, then I'm sorry about that, but there are enough tutorials, examples out there that you can find by yourself by just using Google.   If anyone tells you that Maven 2 isn't ready...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:32:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:32:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:32:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tim O'Brien</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Awful, Awful, Just Awful, Is it April Fools Day?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Listen, the idea of moving from Procedural XML to Procedural Annotated java for something that should never have to be written for every project in the first place is insanity....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:29:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:29:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:29:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tim O'Brien</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java to build Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It looks like a way of using the java language to build a java project.<br><br>What we need is a more consise way to describe the build without having the java language/syntax get in the way.<br><br>Maybe sone kind of build DSL.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:53:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java to build Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It looks like a way of using the java language to build a java project.

What we need is a more consise way to describe the build without having the java language/syntax get in the way.

Maybe sone kind of build DSL.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:43:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:43:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:43:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 20, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Martin Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maven2?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've used Maven 2 for a bit now, and I agree that it still feels a bit "raw" in places, but it's come a long way. I would hope that most/all of the current annoyances would be cleared out in the next few releases.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:10:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:10:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:10:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rory Winston</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Beanshell</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This would be even easier using the embedded scripting feature coming in Java 6. That would avoid having to compile the 'build class', and would obviously be scriptable and quicker/easier to use. My choice would probably be to use Beanshell (<a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:39:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:39:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:39:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mick d</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Gosling: a build process that uses Java instead of XML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Although I do not like that Ant scripts are XML based, after looking at this Java translation of Ant script I must admit that original Ant script is much more readable! Seriosly, this looks awfull. </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:19:32 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:19:32 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:19:32 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexandre Poitras</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Gosling: a build process that uses Java instead of XML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Although I do not like that Ant scripts are XML based, after looking at this Java translation of Ant script I must admit that original Ant script is much more readable! Seriosly, this looks awfull. Maybe the answer is in creating a non-XML based but...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:14:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:14:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:14:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mileta Cekovic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: It is ant, not just similar</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Using XML for any sort of programming or scripting is generally a bad idea (jelly/xdoclet anyone)? </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:24:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:24:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:24:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: It is ant, not just similar</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> on a large scale project with a complex build that needs maintenance and release engineers who don't know Java.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:13:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:13:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:13:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maven2?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Is Maven2 usable yet?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:59:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:59:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:59:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rob Seegel</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maven2?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=42689</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>It will leverage maven 2's repository for dependency management.</blockquote><br><br>Is Maven2 usable yet? I tried it on a project at the end of last year/beginning of this year, and at that time it was utterly useless.<br>From...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:21:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:21:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:21:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 18, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

