<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Hyperthreading Java, article from Javaworld.com</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:40:48 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>First of all, most J2EE applications are heavy transaction based applications.  At least the ones that I work on in the financial industry.  Because of the J2EE specification, you can't be spawning threads.  You also can't have...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:49:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:49:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:49:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 28, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juergen Hoeller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Yawning article? Don't think so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>SMP systems only came onto the market this year?  HT hasn't been available in consumer level CPUs since 2002? </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:31:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:31:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 06:31:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Fabrizio Giudici</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simpler is great but cheaper is needed too;)</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The problem I see with Javolution and similar (see e.g. java.util.concurent etc.) is that you still incur the full overhead of Java (and underlying OS) threads. With 100-core CPU why would one have to create 100 threads to speed up matrix multiplication...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:26:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:26:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:26:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nikolay Ognyanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Uhh.... &quot;Hyper-Threading&quot;?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It looks like this really has nothing to do with Intel's trademarked hyper-threading, which also has nothing to do with dual-core CPUs.  (The author clearly has little grasp on the subject matter and the difference between SMT and SMP.)  Basic...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:22:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:22:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:22:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christopher Stach II</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simpler solutions exist.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[For algorithm parallelization, simpler and more elegant solutions exists such as Javolution's <a href="http://javolution.org/api/javolution/context/ConcurrentContext.html">ConcurrentContext</a>. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:03:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:03:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:03:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jean-Marie Dautelle</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No much hyper</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>With all due respect to author's efforts and achievements, I do not see much "hyper" in this threading.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:15:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:15:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:15:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Eugelink</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>No much hyper</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[With all due respect to author's efforts and achievements, I do not see much "hyper" in this threading. It is seems to me as just manual split to tasks then assigned to threads. What we are going to need over time with massive multi-core CPU chips is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:19:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:19:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:19:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nikolay Ognyanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So I see a number of issues with this article and the blurb at the top that says this can have application in the J2EE space.<br><br>First of all, most J2EE applications are heavy transaction based applications.  At least the ones that I work...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:48:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What!?!?<br><br>How can you program without an application server? There's no way to access a database, or send messages, or invoke web services, or serve up web pages without a super-powered, do everything application server! At least that's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:36:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:36:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:36:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[What!?!?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:35:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:35:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:35:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Galpin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Any advantage over SEDA?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Does this approach provide any advantage over using something like ServiceMix which implements SEDA?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:45:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:45:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:45:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marc Tremblay</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>commonj WorkManager implementations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The commonj WorkManager specification is also supported on BEA's WebLogic Application Server platform in both 8.x (a backport project) and 9.x versions. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:30:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:30:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:30:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I added the WorkManager spec to WebSphere and then ...</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:26:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:26:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:26:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>A. M.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think the article is interesting, but as far as it's application to J2EE, I think it is fud.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:04:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Gras</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Transactions, Request Queues, Multi-Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43180</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I beg to differ. If only the simple threading models offered by typical containers were adequate for the diversity of applications out there. I added the WorkManager spec to WebSphere and then standardized it using the commonj APIs for exactly this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:59:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:59:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:59:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Billy Newport</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

