<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Java Plugin Framework (JPF) 1.0 Released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:17:49 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>How does it compare to SCA?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does JPF compares to Service Component Architecture (SCA)?
Is it SCA complaint?

Looks like it is yet another non-standards complaint component framework... :(]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:23:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:23:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:23:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 10, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ruslan Zenin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: And what about JSR 277</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JPF is the complete ready to use solution to add modularity to any Java application. It is very flexible and extensible. Possibly it will be later adapted to JSR 277.

//Dmitry]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:27:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:27:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:27:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitry Alex</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Eclipse and OSGi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JPF implements plug-in classloaders isolation approach (like in Eclipse or Java EE containers). This allows you to run different versions of the same Java library in different plug-ins.

//Dmitry]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:22:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:22:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:22:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitry Alex</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Eclipse and OSGi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Their DTD seemed to allow you to specify version numbers, so I would guess so. But I don't see how it is supposed to be simpler than OSGI especially given the tooling support for OSGI in eclipse.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:20:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:20:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 07:20:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hani Naguib</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Eclipse and OSGi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Eclipse abandoned their plug-in model in favor of OSGi... I think in the 3.2 timeframe....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:08:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:08:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:08:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bryant Harris</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How does it compare with?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JMX and JBI?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:11:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:11:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:11:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lyndon Samson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>And what about JSR 277</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does JPF position relative to JSR 277 Java Module system?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:43:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:43:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:43:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>S�bastien Arbogast</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Re: Java Plugin Framework (JPF) 1.0 Released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JPF is an alternative to OSGi that has similar set of features but much simple in learn and use. I'm not an expert in OSGi and thus can't give you side-by-side comparison. You may find several discussions on this theme at JPF forum:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:41:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:41:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:41:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitry Alex</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java Plugin Framework (JPF) 1.0 Released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does this framework compare to OSGI?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:53:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:53:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:53:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hani Naguib</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java Plugin Framework (JPF) 1.0 Released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43758</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://jpf.sourceforge.net">JPF</a>, an open source, LGPL licensed library intended to provide standard plug-in infrastructure Java projects, has reached version 1.0. It's been influenced by, but not derived from, Eclipse' plugin structure. It's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:23:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:23:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:23:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitry Alex</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

