<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Jesse Kuhnert: new OGNL coming soon?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:31:55 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>jdk1.4</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We have now stopped JFDI development in favour of MVEL, Chris is incorporating most of our designs for a high performance pluggeable reflection based scripting language with future plans for JIT. For us it's important that the reflection language is as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:46:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:46:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:46:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark Proctor</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Numbers are fishy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Interesting. I have to ask though - just as a sanity check - what exactly is the use case where cold start time / parsing of string content will matter more than what happens "in production" ? In development mode it would be "nice" , but hardly something...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:12:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:12:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:12:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jkuhnert</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Numbers are fishy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Okay.  MVEL's interpreted mode figures measure how long it from a cold start of the parser, to the fully resolved results from the expression.  Not how long it takes to re-execute a pre-built AST.  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:01:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:01:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:01:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christopher Brock</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Numbers are fishy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I should at least clear up the confusion about what these tests reflect. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:08:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:08:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:08:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jkuhnert</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Numbers are fishy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hehe.... All in good time Chris...All in good time. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:03:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:03:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:03:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jkuhnert</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Numbers are fishy.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I fail to see how some of the numbers add up.  In the first test, the interpreted mode is faster than the compiled mode and AS fast as natively compiled Java math expression, which would not even have a calculation since it would be a compile-time...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:59:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:59:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:59:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christopher Brock</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opensymphony will be taking over OGNL</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm sure if the patch is accepted it will be used in struts2 eventually. (the webwork people have also been kind enough to help me in my efforts, which probably isn't a random coincidence or act of kindness ;) )...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:50:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:50:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:50:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 15, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jkuhnert</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opensymphony will be taking over OGNL</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Would like to see it in struts2, &#38; webwork.

Sudhir S Nimavat]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:14:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:14:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:14:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 15, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Shailendra Soni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opensymphony will be taking over OGNL</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Actually, when I requested the move from dev.java.net, Rainer told me Patrick was already on it. Since Patrick is indeed pretty inactive, I have no idea when the move is going to be completed.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:29:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:29:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:29:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 15, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Philip Luppens</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Opensymphony will be taking over OGNL</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Both Drew and Patrick are pretty inactive right now, so Rainer is in the process of migrating the OGNL source code from java.net to opensymphony's svn repository.  We had some bug fixes that needed to be addressed.  Once that happens, if we get a patch...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:12:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:12:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:12:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 15, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brandon India</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jesse Kuhnert: new OGNL coming soon?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43837</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jesse Kuhnert has posted that a <a href="http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster">new OGNL release is on the horizon</a>, with speed increases. <a href="http://www.ognl.org/">OGNL</a> is an expression...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:49:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:49:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:49:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 15, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

