<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - iScreen 1.1.0 released:  POJO Validation Framework</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:08:10 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Internationalization</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This raises an interesting question:  why wouldn't validation belong in the Object, itself? </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:00:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:00:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:00:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 5, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mschipperheyn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XML for validation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Writing lines of unsafe xml code for not writing a few lines of java code is not suitable for me. I prefer annotation based validation framework. XML shall be used just for extreme cases where annotations does not help. This is what JSR 303 targeted....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:31:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:31:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:31:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Deniz Oguz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XML to leak business logic.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[For security concern, business logic should not be placed in XML descriptors. People accessing to the XML files can easily change the business logic without being notified. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 03:22:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 03:22:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 03:22:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Huang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Just a little offtopic, but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Can't we check in the "set" method if the condition is met, if not then throw an exception (possible an specialized exception for this type of validation) ? Can it be simple like this ?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:35:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:35:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:35:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 31, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jerome Angibaud</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Just a little offtopic, but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This raises an interesting question:  why wouldn't validation belong in the Object, itself?  Why externalize it?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:38:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:38:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:38:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 31, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Shellman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Just a little offtopic, but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ahoy there !...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:07:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 31, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sandro F</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java validation VS XML Validation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, in fact i think that validation of the fundamentale correctness of a business object should reside inside the object class itself (so be written in java). Some simple frameworks/patterns will help to make this code non-boring (see exemple below)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:25:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:25:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:25:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 30, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jerome Angibaud</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: iScreen 1.1.0 released:  POJO Validation Framework</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In comparison to commons-validator:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:08:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:08:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:08:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 30, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Shellman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: iScreen 1.1.0 released:  POJO Validation Framework</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[What makes this project fundamentally different or better that commons-validator?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:48:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:48:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:48:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 30, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jean-Baptiste Nizet</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>iScreen 1.1.0 released:  POJO Validation Framework</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44024</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Typically, form validation is handled by the presentation layer.  Though this close integration with the presentation layer can help make web development easier, the validation frameworks provided by these presentation frameworks are typically weak....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:59:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:59:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:59:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 30, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Shellman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

