<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Stephen Colebourne on comparing closure specs</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:05:21 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: CICE looks like status quo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Here's the syntax I want:<br><br>button.addActionListener(handleButtonPress);<br><br>Is it too hard to figure out this basic freaking idea of first-class functional values?  Have I grossly overestimated the intelligence of Java's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:56:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:56:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:56:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 7, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>tr mo</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Stephen Colebourne on comparing closure specs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am having a conversation with Stephen and Stefan regarding their proposal and its relationship to the goals of BGGA. Stephen tells me that "We intended FCM to be mostly about syntax sugar, providing a better syntax for code that can be written today....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:15:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:15:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:15:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 6, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Neal Gafter</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Method pointer</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've not opinion about "anonymous method"/closure. But about named, I think using function pointer like in C, is the simplest solution....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:33:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:33:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:33:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 5, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>David Bernard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Why not</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There are two components to any language change - syntax and semantics. Syntax only matters in terms of visual appeal, verbosity and clarity, and is often subjective. Semantics are far more important, as they define what the code actually does....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:15:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:15:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 06:15:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 4, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephen Colebourne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why not use the following:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:55:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:55:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:55:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 3, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guillermo Schwarz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Native XML</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm betting that native XML won't happen - it's never struck me as a good language change idea.
Stephen Colebourne, FCM]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:04:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:04:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:04:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 3, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephen Colebourne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Stephen Colebourne on comparing closure specs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One thing that really bugs me about FCM is that they are overloading the hash (#) symbol.  How will they resolve this with Java-7's XML integration, where this was used in the proposed syntax at JavaOne? (<a class="jive-link-external"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:41:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:41:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:41:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 3, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ben Manes</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: CICE looks like status quo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It is an open issue in the proposal as to whether to require the types when the method isn't overloaded:<br><br>"5.  Is there a shortcut syntax to avoid specifying the types in a method literal or invocable method reference when the method is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:38:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:38:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:38:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chuck Adams</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: CICE looks like status quo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Here's the syntax I want:<br><br>button.addActionListener(handleButtonPress);<br><br>Is it too hard to figure out this basic freaking idea of first-class functional values?  Have I grossly overestimated the intelligence of Java's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:57:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:57:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:57:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OMG, you can't be serious</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What's wrong with either creating a method type...<br><br>int multiplier = 3;<br>Method m = int comput(value) {<br> return mutliplier * value;<br>}<br><br>int result = m.invoke(3);<br><br></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:48:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:48:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:48:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Stephen Colebourne on comparing closure specs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In my opinion closures without type inference is adding complexity, not removing it.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:41:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:41:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:41:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ricky Clarkson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Control invocation syntax</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The authors of CICE (Josh Bloch notably) do not believe that developers should be allowed to write code in this style. They believe that only language designers should be able to make changes that look visually like keywords.<br><br>The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:37:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:37:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:37:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nebojsa Vasiljevic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Control invocation syntax</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A number of replies have focussed on the control invocation syntax of BGGA, which allows you to do the following:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:42:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:42:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:42:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephen Colebourne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Need better examples</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Neal Gafter: <a href="http://www.bejug.org/confluenceBeJUG/display/PARLEYS/Closures+for+Java" target="_blank">http://www.bejug.org/confluenceBeJUG/display/PARLEYS/Closures+for+Java</a></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:04:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:04:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:04:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nebojsa Vasiljevic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Need better examples</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=44467</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Neal Gafter: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.bejug.org/confluenceBeJUG/display/PARLEYS/Closures+for+Java" target="_newWindow">http://www.bejug.org/confluenceBeJUG/display/PARLEYS/Closures+for+Java</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:12:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:12:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:12:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ben Manes</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

