<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JRockit for Java SE 6 is GA</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:15:44 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Great news! but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>however our obfuscated jars don't work because we do use long class/pakage names and this message appears:<br>   java.util.zip.ZipException: name length exceeds 512 bytes<br><br>sun removed this limit with 1.4.0: isn't it supposed...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:00:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:00:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:00:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 26, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Webstart JRockit VM downloader servlet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Is there a JRockit VM downloader servlet that supports JNLP clients - i.e. swing clients lauched via WebStart?<br><br>The downloader servlet controls the VM needed on the client side, OS etc.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:24:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:24:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:24:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JRockit SE 6 Bundled With WebLogic Server 10</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Anyone know if/when JRockit 6 will be bundled in WebLogic 10?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:39:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:39:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:39:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Colin Wrinch</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Webstart JRockit VM downloader servlet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Is there a JRockit VM downloader servlet that supports JNLP clients - i.e. swing clients lauched via WebStart?

The downloader servlet controls the VM needed on the client side, OS etc.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:11:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:11:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:11:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sothy Namasivayam</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Great news! but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>however our obfuscated jars don't work because we do use long class/pakage names and this message appears:<br>   java.util.zip.ZipException: name length exceeds 512 bytes<br><br>sun removed this limit with 1.4.0: isn't it supposed to be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:13:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:13:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:13:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Great news! but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[great news: tried the beta and found it to be a great product, expecially for the mission control tool which is years light head of jconsole !...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:56:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:56:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:56:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Simone Avogadro</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Congratulations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Good work, guys, congrats to the team on the release.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:06:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dalibor Topic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Interesting result</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>For some reason, the 1.4.2 binaries finish the benchmark in roughly 6.5 seconds vs 9.5 seconds with 1.5.0 binaries. I've noticed the same result using SUN's jvm to run the benchmark......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:52:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:52:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:52:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Interesting result</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For some reason, the 1.4.2 binaries finish the benchmark in roughly 6.5 seconds vs 9.5 seconds with 1.5.0 binaries. I've noticed the same result using SUN's jvm to run the benchmark...<br><br>Do you have an idea why that happens Henrik?  I'm...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:49:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:49:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:49:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JVM Max Heap Size</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I would be interested in seeing what kind of maximum heap size you can give it on a 64 bit system. Haven't had much luck getting Sun's past 1.5GB or so..</blockquote><br><br>This may be not the problem with JVM per se, but rather...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:45:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:45:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:45:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 14, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Interesting result</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I just downloaded the release and ran some tests. Using my RETE rule engine I ran manners 128 benchmark with 2 different binaries. One is compiled using SUN jdk1.4.2 and the second with Sun jdk1.5.0....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:36:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:36:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:36:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>BEA WLS/ SUN JDK on Linux</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[On Linux, i understand BEA on "Red Hat Linux 4.0 AS/ES 64 Bit x86 Hardware" does support upto few TB on memory ...but i wanted to know how much is supported with SUN JDK ?

is it true "BEA WLS does not support Sun JDK on Linux." ???]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:09:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:09:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:09:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ruc sha</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JVM Max Heap Size</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I would be interested in seeing what kind of maximum heap size you can give it on a 64 bit system. Haven't had much luck getting Sun's past 1.5GB or so..</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:00:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:00:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:00:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artur Karazniewicz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Mac version</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Now that Macs have thoroughly infiltrated the Java developer community, can we expect a Mac (Intel) version any time soon?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:44:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:44:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:44:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JVM Max Heap Size</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45002</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I would be interested in seeing what kind of maximum heap size you can give it on a 64 bit system.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 13, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

