<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Terracotta's Scalability Story</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:20:05 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: This is the path to the future</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Anyway I see a performance problem with Terracotta with the fine grain (per field) notification when several fields are going to be modified simultaneously, too many separated calls to the server, isn't it.<br><br>Good work<br><br>Jose M....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:05:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:05:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:05:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ARI ZILKA</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>This is the path to the future</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the Terracotta guys are driven a new generation of computing....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:39:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:39:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:39:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Benchmarks</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've seen the demo of Terracotta 2 weeks ago. Very impressive. It should be interesting to see a comparison with a simple application. A sort of OO7 benchmark for ODBMS.

Ciao,
Luca Garulli
RomaFramework.org
AssetData.it]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:33:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:33:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:33:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Luca Garulli</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How does having a Buddy System like JBoss Cache...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Not sure how other buddy replication mechanisms work, but in JBoss Cache, sys admins are able to provide "hints" on how buddies are selected (details in the JBC user guide).  This allows them to identify which nodes are buddies to other nodes, so with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:39:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:39:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:39:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Manik Surtani</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Actually Terracotta already provides...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[...a HTTPSession clustering which does not require that objects require to implement the Serializable interface. Should have looked before posting.

Sameer]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:32:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:32:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:32:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sameer Wadkar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question about hybrid approach of Teracotta and HTTPSession api</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks Steve,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:25:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:25:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:25:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sameer Wadkar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How does having a Buddy System like JBoss Cache...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't know much about jboss cache. But... I've talked to a few admins of large clusters and here is what I've heard:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:00:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:00:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:00:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>steve harris</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How does having a Buddy System like JBoss Cache...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[break the failover mechanism by restarting all servers?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:25:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:25:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:25:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sameer Wadkar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Terracotta's Scalability Story</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45037</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Open Terracotta is a product that delivers JVM-level clustering as a runtime infrastructure service. It is Open Source and available under a Mozilla-based license.  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:20:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:20:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:20:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

