<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:21:27 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>JSP has got separation of concerns muddled</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Reading these posts, I can't help but think people need to take the blinkers off and start looking at the bigger picture when it comes to real seperation of concerns and real reuse. My 2 cents worth, is that the 'view' should be what is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Copeland</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>So, are Zombies alive? :0</blockquote><br><br>nice one _o_</blockquote>
:)  I could have taken it in a really bad direction. As in .. if JSPs are dead and people are still messing with them, then that makes them ... :-&#38;]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:39:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:39:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:39:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Keep things into perspective</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JSP's are fine.  Perfect? No where near it.  Are there better alternatives now? Plenty.  Put things in perspective.  There's a whole lot of ways to screw up a J2EE application and if everything else is architected correctly and the only 'fault' is the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:26:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:26:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:26:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Klaene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So, are Zombies alive? :0</blockquote>

nice one _o_]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:08:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:08:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:08:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dennis Bekkering</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'll say it, jsp sucks because it is compiled as a servlet. The programming model isn't that bad even though I prefer something like Velocity but the implementation model, generating a servlet instead of using an interpreter, turns JSP into a declarative...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:18:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:18:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:18:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexandre Poitras</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Now please don't say that they are bad because they compile into Servlets, so its a negative point. Your code compiles into object code, so that must be a bad thing as well..</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:17:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:17:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:17:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexandre Poitras</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>My JSP Experience</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I found that JSP (using the XML syntax) was quite useful in a few of the projects I did over the years....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:54:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:54:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:54:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Khun Yee Fung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSPs are doing well, thank you</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>JSPs are the ultimate contradiction to Java reusability, there is simply no mechanism in J2EE which allows even an honest man to reuse a JSP.</blockquote>, ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:19:29 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:19:29 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:19:29 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Guys..Jsps are dead..No doubt about that..Just because people have used it does not make it a good product..People have used Struts for so many years but that does not make it a good Web Framework...People have used Apache Torque for ORM but that does...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:03:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:03:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:03:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Surjendu Kuila</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Reuse isn't an end goal</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I think seeing reuse everywhere is often counter-productive.</blockquote><br><br>A-men.  This holy grail of "reuse" has been the cause of some of the biggest cluster****'s of frameworks I've ever seen.  Don't misread me here;...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:04:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:04:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:04:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter Thomas</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>missing HTML is suddenly the biggest mistake we all ever do ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[wow ... now missing HTML is suddenly the biggest mistake we all ever do .. ? .. am I really that outdated ? ... LOL :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:19:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:19:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:19:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Denny Mahendra</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Reuse isn't an end goal</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think seeing reuse everywhere is often counter-productive. /blockquote&gt;...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:57:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:57:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:57:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>michael campbell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I can't see that JSP, used properly (using component based includes, a proper tag library and so on) are any worse than any other component based web gui creation frameworks. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:43:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:43:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:43:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: very biased comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>it is bad and ugly because you did not take it to the next level, it's called the "component architecture"</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:45:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:45:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:45:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter Thomas</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Zarar Siddiqi: Are JSPs Dead?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45080</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Reading these posts, I can't help but think people need to take the blinkers off and start looking at the bigger picture when it comes to real seperation of concerns and real reuse. My 2 cents worth, is that the 'view' should be what is rendered by the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:44:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:44:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:44:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Gleeson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

