<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Why do you think CGLib proxies are faster than JDK Proxies?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:33:32 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Performance Issues : Lookup method VS setter injection</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have realized significant difference in performance metrics when the non-singleton bean(prototype bean) is injected into a non-singleton OR singleton bean using setter(or property) injection and lookup method....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:43:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:43:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:43:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>RAJESHWAR VADHERAJU</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>4M2: Seems like CGLib is faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, I was googling to find out which one was faster and landed up on this thread. I ran the example provided by Bob and in my machine, CGLib is faster than JDK Proxy</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:25:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:25:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:25:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 31, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gergely Nagy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Seems like CGLib is faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I was googling to find out which one was faster and landed up on this thread. I ran the example provided by Bob and in my machine, CGLib is faster than JDK Proxy....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:22:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:22:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:22:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yohan Liyanage</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>So if I understand correctly, it runs faster for you, but not for someone else. Same code should run the same assuming the hardware is similar enough. If there's a difference, then it must be something causing it....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:24:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:24:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:24:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 26, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ah..It's the old bait and switch. First you have to prove the theory incorrect and then you get suckered in to providing a full tutorial on all technologies used in the original question posed. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:36:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:36:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:36:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jkuhnert</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So if I understand correctly, it runs faster for you, but not for someone else. Same code should run the same assuming the hardware is similar enough. If there's a difference, then it must be something causing it.<br><br>peter</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:21:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:21:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:21:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Is there a difference in the hardware like CPU?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How about this</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Maybe what would be helpful is for you to explain why the code links in the article runs slower.  You answered my question by sending me completely new code....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Prodeep Ready</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Is there a difference in the hardware like CPU?</blockquote>

No, Cglib really is faster, unless of course you're lucky enough to have a proxy which returns the exact same value every time regardless of the method. ;)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:55:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:55:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:55:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>could it be differences in hardware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Is there a difference in the hardware like CPU?


peter]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:37:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:37:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:37:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Why do you think CGLib proxies are faster than JDK Proxies?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In case anone is interested, there is a library called Jakarta Commons Proxy (it's in the sandbox) that allows you to easily switch between JDK, CGLIB, and Javassist for your proxying technology.  It might be useful in benchmarking these technologies...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:46:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:46:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:46:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Carman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Cglib is NOT definitly faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Didn't Crazy Bob provide a link to his code  -- </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:31:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:31:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:31:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Prodeep Ready</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Cglib is NOT definitly faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Java Proxies are faster.  If you need to intercept with classes then CGLib makes sense since proxies can't do this, but I won't accept people saying CGLib is faster until they provide code proving it.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:39:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:39:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:39:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Cglib is NOT definitly faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I suspect you're including the proxy creation in your test and using code like this to create your cglib </blockquote><br><br>The code is available in the links and does not include creation part in the timing as you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:35:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:35:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:35:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Anjan Bacchu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Cglib is NOT definitly faster</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45089</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I suspect you're including the proxy creation in your test and using code like this to create your cglib </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:30:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:30:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:30:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Prodeep Ready</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

