<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Wicket Development - TheServerSide Video Interview</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:00:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Wicket Development - TheServerSide Video Interview</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Nick Heudecker, founder of System Mobile, <a href="http://www.manning.com/peak">co-author of Hibernate Quickly</a>, and respected Java developer, talks about the Wicket framework, its technology, how to quickly get into it, and how it compares against...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:51:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:00:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:51:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 26, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Ciurana</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>19</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>* Wicket components are very easy to write. I find a component like the af:chooseColor funny rather than useful. If you need such a component, you can write one in an hour or two with Wicket and have exactly what you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:40:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:40:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:40:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 5, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Frank Silbermann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>@Steven<br><br>You are right about the fact that Wicket is grounded in HTML (and XML/ XSL if you need that actually). Though there is no reason why other markup variants can't be supported, they aren't implemented...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 08:26:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 08:26:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 08:26:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 29, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Code behind is worse than JSP</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Look at .NET code behind.  junk.</blockquote>Yes. But why? Because it is half-assed. It doesn't manage the state of your pages (you have to use viewstate objects for that, and it's still page-, not component...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Code behind is worse than JSP</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Look at .NET code behind.  junk.</blockquote>Yes. But why? Because it is half-assed. It doesn't manage the state of your pages (you have to use viewstate objects for that, and it's still page-, not component based)</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:33:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:33:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:33:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Code behind is worse than JSP</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Look at .NET code behind.  junk....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:50:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:50:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:50:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>* Wicket components are very easy to write. I find a component like the af:chooseColor funny rather than useful. If you need such a component, you can write one in an hour or two with Wicket and have exactly what you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:27:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:27:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:27:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Either way, flex is great for gui construction and their mxml component model is awesome.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:16:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:16:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:16:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I really do not get the comparison between JSF and Wicket.  To me they address different spaces.  All wicket does is gives you a way to put "code behind" HTML (and conceed that it does it pretty darn well).  JSF is a component framework that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:37:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:37:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:37:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Wille Faler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: AI tech built from wicket</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Let's say you have a component you wish to update via ajax. First, you have to create the component, add it and call setOutputMarkupId(true):...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:10:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:10:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:10:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Janos Cserep</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: AI tech built from wicket</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How is ajax supported in Wicket ?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:17:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:17:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 13:17:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mittal Bhiogade</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AI tech built from wicket</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[datawink.com]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:24:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:24:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:24:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>neunet n</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Wicket user tries JSF</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Very good article on wicket vs jsf:

<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/" target="_newWindow">http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/a-wicket-user-tries-jsf/</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:10:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:10:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:10:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dimitris Menounos</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Code behind is worse than JSP</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Look at .NET code behind.  junk....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:28:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:28:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 07:28:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tal Dega</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Don't get the comparison</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45507</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>* Wicket components are very easy to write. I find a component like the af:chooseColor funny rather than useful. If you need such a component, you can write one in an hour or two with Wicket and have exactly what you need.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:11:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:11:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:11:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jan de Jonge</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

