<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Interface21 announces Spring Web Services 1.0</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:24:45 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:14:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:14:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:14:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Davide Gesino</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>OK, I can see how that would solve the problem and in this case the bi-directional relationship should potentially exist in any case. We didn't actually have a domain model when I dealt with this.  We were also bound to JAXB generated classes...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:43:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:43:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:43:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Blaise Doughan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract first</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><br><br>Because Java data structures and XML data structures aren't the same?<br><br>Because auto-generated XML-Java bindings are brittle and kill the possibility of re-using common schemas? Common schemas allow you to define a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:36:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:36:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:36:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Contract first</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><br><br>Because Java data structures and XML data structures aren't the same?<br><br>Because auto-generated XML-Java bindings are brittle and kill the possibility of re-using common schemas? Common schemas allow you to define a common...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:14:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:14:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 03:14:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In this specific use case if you have control over your object model the solution is straight forward.  I would make the relationship between Item and Box bi-directional (in your object model) and then in the object-to-XML mapping metadata...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:40:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:40:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:40:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think maybe I didn't explain it well enough.  The data coming from the core system looked like this:<br><br>item: 1<br>   box: A<br>      quant: 5<br>   box: B<br>      quant: 5<br>item: 2<br>   box: A<br>      quant: 10<br>item: 3<br>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:52:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Blaise Doughan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Unfathomable</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>70 or so posts  about "contract first webservices". Just incredible. A Java Interface is an excellent interface and a contract. THAT IS WHAT IT IS DESIGNED FOR. <br><br>Why it should be better to design an unreadable xml structure than to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:08:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:08:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:08:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jason Carreira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Unfathomable</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[70 or so posts  about "contract first webservices". Just incredible. A Java Interface is an excellent interface and a contract. THAT IS WHAT IT IS DESIGNED FOR. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:44:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:44:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:44:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think maybe I didn't explain it well enough.  The data coming from the core system looked like this:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:36:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:36:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:36:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for the link.  I looked at the examples and it looks pretty straight-forward for simple xml to object mappings.<br><br>However, one challenge I have faced in the past is how to do complex mappings.  For example, once I had to deal with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:02:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:02:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:02:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Blaise Doughan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>I want to bind to my own (or my team members') custom objects.  Binding and generating are two distinct activities.</blockquote><br><br>A fact that's been largely missed by the Java XML frameworks,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:48:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:48:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:48:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Keith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Thanks for pointing this out.  I went to the EclipseLink project and poked around the wiki but didn't find much.  Is there somewhere you can point me to that explains their approach to this?</blockquote><br><br>Eventually there...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:15:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:15:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:15:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Contract-first is supported by pretty much everyone</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for pointing this out.  I went to the EclipseLink project and poked around the wiki but didn't find much.  Is there somewhere you can point me to that explains their approach to this?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:26:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:26:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:26:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Blaise Doughan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: WS transaction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Probably not much at this point. If you are interested in a WS-AT implementation Spring WS is not going to provide that just as Spring-WS does not aim at providing a SOAP stack. It does help you use some WS-* stuff, for example, WS-Security...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:44:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:44:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:44:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Quinn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: WS transaction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46635</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Probably not much at this point. If you are interested in a WS-AT implementation Spring WS is not going to provide that just as Spring-WS does not aim at providing a SOAP stack. It does help you use some WS-* stuff, for example, WS-Security by leveraging...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:44:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:44:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:44:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Satadru Roy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

