<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:37:55 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I certainly like the idea of not over bloating Java with more features. Sure, generics are nice, so it's the super package and there are probably lots of use cases where one will need something of this sort, but why to put everything dynamic languages...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:03:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:03:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:03:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Radu Popa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Sharing objects across languages</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One thing that has not yet emerged is how JSR 223 will act as a broker of objects between languages. If I create an object in a Jython script then how can I access the same object in a Groovy script. I'm looking forward to what John has to propose....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:17:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:17:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:17:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fcohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How it make difference in programmers life?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If JVM supports multiple languages then what the advantage the programming community gets out of that. Programmers are less interested at VM level. <br><br>Sorry but I am really trying to understand how we can get...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:07:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:07:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:07:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 22, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ciaran Dunn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Slippery Slope</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the idea is sound, but don't expect it to be simple - politically or technically....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:27:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:27:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:27:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 21, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matthew Wilson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It is definitely a very good idea. We can have C#, VB and Fortran on JVM. (each language has its own audience and developers)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:51:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:51:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:51:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Siamak Sarmady</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A very good thing for Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This is very good news for Java and Dynamic Scripting. The JSR 223 ScriptEngine supports JNI dispatching to external script languages (that is a bad idea) and a common API to call on-the-fly byte-code compiler script engines (a very good idea.) The more...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:35:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:35:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:35:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fcohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This sounds an interesting idea....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:54:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:54:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:54:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Denys Sene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No, please DO NOT change VM</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Unfortunately, SUN has a very bad track record in imitating .NET. Just compare generics in .NET and Java.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:50:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:50:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:50:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Thiago Concei????o</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Superpackages</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Here's a link that represents the basic idea of a superpackage as I understand it but it does seem that the term is being used differently in some circles:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:53:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:53:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:53:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No, please DO NOT change VM</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I also don't understand the need for 'superpackages'. Package system already works fine (more or less), I've never seen versioned assemblies used in _real_ .NET projects, for example.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:19:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:19:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:19:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Eugelink</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am not in any way an expert in JVM or VM's in general....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:05:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:05:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:05:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Arne Vajh??j</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No, please DO NOT change VM</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Unfortunately, SUN has a very bad track record in imitating .NET. Just compare generics in .NET and Java.<br><br>I also don't understand the need for 'superpackages'. Package system already works fine (more or less), I've never seen versioned...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:07:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:07:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:07:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Is that still bytecode compatible with JVM?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> They may define variations or extensions of the class format, or new kinds of objects, whose meaning and behavior are beyond the scope of current Java and JVM specifications.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:30:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:30:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:30:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jan Venema</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Multi-Language VM proposal from OpenJDK mailing list</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Personally, I think this is an excellent idea, and support it 100%.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:29:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:29:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:29:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Anodos Faeryblood</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Will it incorporate Parrot?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47240</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Will the proposed Open VM incorporate the work of the <a href="http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/">Parrot</a> Project - Python , Perl etc in a common VM?

<a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog">Paul , People and Technology Blog</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:14:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:14:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:14:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>paul browne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

