http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 19 May 2013 06:21:00 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 blog rencontre]]> Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:56:26 -0400 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:56:26 -0400 Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:56:26 -0400 Apr 6, 2008 Loana Morgane 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Another variation on Option 2 is to isolate all dependencies in protected methods, and then extend the class under test, overriding the methods that have external dependencies with local mock...]]> Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:26:00 -0500 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:26:00 -0500 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:26:00 -0500 Feb 22, 2008 ZongYin Cao 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:35:49 -0500 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:35:49 -0500 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:35:49 -0500 Feb 20, 2008 ZongYin Cao 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:15:09 -0500 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:15:09 -0500 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:15:09 -0500 Feb 1, 2008 Mordred QV 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 You are correct that JMock requires a no-arg constructor, however this is not a limitation of cglib itself. You actually have a choice here:

• provide a protected no-arg constructor

...]]> Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:07:30 -0500 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:07:30 -0500 Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:07:30 -0500 Dec 4, 2007 Ric Wang 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:53:59 -0500 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:53:59 -0500 Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:53:59 -0500 Dec 3, 2007 Larry Singer 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 ......]]> Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:25:22 -0500 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:25:22 -0500 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:25:22 -0500 Dec 2, 2007 Ric Wang 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 class B implements IB {
...
}...]]> Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:42:43 -0500 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:42:43 -0500 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:42:43 -0500 Dec 2, 2007 Larry Singer 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Also, EasyMock and jMock, the two most pervasive mocking frameworks, use interfaces. So I'm not sure what mocking framework you guys are using....]]> Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:45:26 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:45:26 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:45:26 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Rogerio Liesenfeld 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 There are many good reasons for writing interfaces, but making code testable is not one of those reasons. None of the test frameworks require interfaces. The mocking frameworks also do not require interfaces. Thanks to Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:48:17 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:48:17 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:48:17 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Thai Dang Vu 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:38 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:38 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:31:38 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Ric Wang 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 ...]]> Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:15:34 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:15:34 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:15:34 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Ric Wang 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:50:58 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:50:58 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:50:58 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Leif Ashley 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 I would like to stress on one point about this article. It focusses on applications that write (or try to) unit tests at a point after the design and the code has been created. ...]]> Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:09:16 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:09:16 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:09:16 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Paul Beckford 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47691 I would like to stress on one point about this article. It focusses on applications that write (or try to) unit tests at a point after the design and the code has been created. ...]]> Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:32:33 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:32:33 -0500 Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:32:33 -0500 Nov 30, 2007 Paul Beckford 0