http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Fri, 24 May 2013 06:42:11 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Benchmarks are for idiots. Benchmarks are a very useful way of comparing performance for particular tasks. Caring about the performance of your app server is an idiotic concern? Says much about your attitude. Well done.]]> Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:03:34 -0500 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:03:34 -0500 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:03:34 -0500 Dec 8, 2007 Persistability Ltd 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:13:17 -0500 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:13:17 -0500 Sat, 08 Dec 2007 02:13:17 -0500 Dec 8, 2007 MOHAN RADHAKRISHNAN 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:44:40 -0500 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:44:40 -0500 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:44:40 -0500 Dec 7, 2007 Gavin King 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Could that be the reason why to date JBoss has not published a single industry standard benchmark result for their application server? Benchmarks are for idiots.]]> Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:57:57 -0500 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:57:57 -0500 Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:57:57 -0500 Dec 7, 2007 Roy Russo 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Wow William, you sure do like to talk a lot. Its like watching a game of tag isn't it? You're it..]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:39:44 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:39:44 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:39:44 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 Gary P 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:12:44 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:12:44 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:12:44 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 Tom Elrod 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 ...]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:11:24 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:11:24 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:11:24 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 wlouth 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 The "mixing" reference was in relation to the usage of a unit testing framework|tool|approach for integration|acceptance|performance testing....]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:08:21 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:08:21 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:08:21 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 Stan Silvert 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:47:52 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:47:52 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:47:52 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 wlouth 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 I read the original post to question the ability to do proper performance testing in the context of unit-tests. A valid and pretty interesting question in my opinion....]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:26:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:26:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:26:53 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 Stan Silvert 5 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 I do have a "beef" with unit testing when applied incorrectly such as in your case were you mix wrongly it with integration testing and performance testing....]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:01:21 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:01:21 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:01:21 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 Stan Silvert 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 ...]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:48:49 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:48:49 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:48:49 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 wlouth 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:53:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:53:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:53:53 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 wlouth 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 ...]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:33:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:33:53 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:33:53 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 wlouth 5 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47747 So if I am understanding you now, your beef is with unit testing in general...]]> Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:33:18 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:33:18 -0500 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:33:18 -0500 Dec 6, 2007 magnus rydin 6