<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Apache Wicket 1.3 released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:03:48 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Wicket Bench 0.5 released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Wicket Bench just released version 0.5 of the Eclipse Wicket plugin:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:31:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:31:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:31:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Martijn Dashorst</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:39:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:39:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:39:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Angeles</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So are you now saying they do share code? :)</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:35:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:35:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:35:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I disagree. Most developers I know would prefer to work on desktop(-like) applications rather than web applications....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:25:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:25:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:25:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The majority of people have chosen html based browser UIs not for maintenance or deployment issues. They did it because they have the herd mentality.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:53:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:53:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:53:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote> Do you really need this strong feature? I think &gt;90% of web applications have no code shared with desktop app, do you agree?</blockquote><br>Don't or shouldn't?  <br><br>I don't write web applictions. I write...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:31:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:31:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:31:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Wicket Web Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Another option is to use the <a href="http://wicketwebbeans.sourceforge.net/">Wicket Web Beans</a> components.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:40:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:40:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:40:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Martijn Dashorst</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: wicket:id ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> What about some more configuration over convention where you bind an object to an entire component (and its ids)?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:38:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:38:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 08:38:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Martijn Dashorst</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: wicket:id ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thank you for these answers. I did not think about the possible multiple wicket:id-s. But I definitively think this would be nice not to change anything on the HTML pages. So these pages can change easily and the java developper simply decorates the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:36:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:36:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:36:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gabriel K.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Keep up the good work!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I second hoping that the core team remains humble and focused on developers feedback and not engage in excessive vanity (as tragically happened with some in Rails community --- I love Rails though). However, I also agree with their firmly...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:22:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:22:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:22:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>x y</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote> Do you really need this strong feature? I think &gt;90% of web applications have no code shared with desktop app, do you agree?</blockquote><br>Don't or shouldn't?  <br><br>I don't write web applictions. I write applications that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:17:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:17:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:17:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released:  Why stick to HTML?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Do you really need this strong feature? I think &gt;90% of web applications have no code shared with desktop app, do you agree?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:06:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:06:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:06:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Keep up the good work!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I second hoping that the core team remains humble and focused on developers feedback and not engage in excessive vanity (as tragically happened with some in Rails community --- I love Rails though). However, I also agree with their firmly responding to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:50:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:50:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:50:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Medhat Saleh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Apache Wicket 1.3 released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[wicket is more complex and verbose than necessary]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:14:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:14:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:14:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dennis Bekkering</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No portlet support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47979</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[well, almost anything :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:04:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:04:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:04:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hans Westerbeek</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

