<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Bruce Eckel: Java, Evolutionary Dead End</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:34:21 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Bruce Eckel is righ, Java has reached language nirvana</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>"The right thing to do is just not add the feature at all (what fun is that?). That if you can't do it right then maybe the language should stop growing and become stable.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:29:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:29:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:29:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Slava Imeshev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Can you give an example of an engineer 'mass producing designs.'  How would one go about producing 1000s or millions or designs at once and what purpose would be served by doing so?</blockquote><br><br>If you are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:29:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ric Wang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I am of the opposite opinion: You have to drive for "digging a hole" kind of simplicity/limitation in order to achieve effective mass production in any industry. Software is no exception.</blockquote><br><br>I agree that simple,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:12:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ric Wang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Can you give an example of an engineer 'mass producing designs.'  How would one go about producing 1000s or millions or designs at once and what purpose would be served by doing so?</blockquote><br><br>If you are referring my...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:11:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:11:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:11:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I am of the opposite opinion: You have to drive for "digging a hole" kind of simplicity/limitation in order to achieve effective mass production in any industry. Software is no exception.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:32:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:32:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:32:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Pyne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Can you give an example of an engineer 'mass producing designs.'  How would one go about producing 1000s or millions or designs at once and what purpose would be served by doing so?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:08:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:08:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:08:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ric Wang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Can you give an example of an engineer 'mass producing designs.'  How would one go about producing 1000s or millions or designs at once and what purpose would be served by doing so?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:55:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:55:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:55:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ric Wang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's wrong with doing it in todya's Java?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>They are useful but I think the cost is too great.  You need a lawyer to decipher the JLS now.  OK, it was already a little convoluted in areas but now it's insane.</blockquote><br><br>Well... I have only briefly skimmed over some...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:02:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:02:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:02:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's wrong with doing it in todya's Java?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>They are useful but I think the cost is too great.  You need a lawyer to decipher the JLS now.  OK, it was already a little convoluted in areas but now it's insane.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:53:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:53:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:53:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Scala feels like chinese</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I don't want to get on my stump (again) but we really do need a more rigorous engineering discipline.  Classic CS is more akin to math or physics and newer style CS programs focused on producing developers lack...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:43:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:43:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:43:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Scala feels like chinese</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What I am against are people trying to twist a language away from the stated goals of it's creator and condescending to people who attempt to use it for what it was designed for.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:49:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:49:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:49:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Pyne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Bruce Eckel: Java, Evolutionary Dead End</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am glad Generics, Enums, improved for loop, etc. were added to Java. I much prefer working with Java 5 than Java 1.4. I don't like the way annotations were implemented, but I'd still rather have them than not....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:25:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:05:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:25:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rick Hightower</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's wrong with doing it in todya's Java?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Because, as has been mentioned already, without breaking backwards compatibility, these features are hard to implement in an elegant way.</blockquote><br>Some maybe but we have to judge on a case-by-case base. Also absolute...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:53:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:53:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:53:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Scala feels like chinese</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>You're right, the business world nowadays requires fast and furious changes. A finance company I worked in bought and sold other companies quicker than a day trader trades stock. New portfolios, new lines of business, merging new lines with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:42:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:42:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 09:42:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Better is not always good</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=47994</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Hi Ric,<br><br>Yes you're you can, All you need is a silver bullet :^). Try reading Fred Brooks.<br><br>Paul.<br><br>PS. I don't mean to be condescending, but Fred Brooks dismissed this myth over 30 years ago. I don't mean to pick...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:12:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:12:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:12:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Beckford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

