<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Slice: OpenJPA for distributed persistence</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:36:24 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>What about HA?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Availability concern is addressed via 'graceful degradation'. Slice can be configured to control what happens when any of the configured database slices becomes unavailable. The property setting is <br>  <br><br>The current options are pretty...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:39:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:39:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:39:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 26, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Georgi Naplatanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Two-phase commit is a bottleneck</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One could argue that same levels of scalability can be achieved if employed correctly.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:14:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:14:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:14:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Galpin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Optimized Two-phase commit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Currently, the commit does ignore database slices that have nothing to commit....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:44:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:44:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:44:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pinaki Poddar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Two-phase commit is a bottleneck</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[....accidentally posted as response to wrong thread.  Couldn't do a rollback :-)  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:30:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:30:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:30:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Greene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: works across WAN?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[2pc can be a bottleneck, but in transactional applications the buffer flushing, disk i/o etc often have a much more damaging effect than the protocol itself.  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:16:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:16:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:16:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Greene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What about HA?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Availability concern is addressed via 'graceful degradation'. Slice can be configured to control what happens when any of the configured database slices becomes unavailable. The property setting is ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:44:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:44:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:44:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pinaki Poddar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What about HA?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does this handle data redundancy for HA? Seems like if you're just partitioning the data across multiple databases, you're adding more single points of failure and bringing your availability way down.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:33:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:33:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:33:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jason Carreira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Two-phase commit is a bottleneck</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It may be lack of clarity in my posting, but Slice is not a 'replication technology'. Slice targets the imminent use case where (non-replicated) data is partitioned across many databases -- many large-scale, enterprise apps are employing...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:36:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:36:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:36:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Two-phase commit is a bottleneck</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It may be lack of clarity in my posting, but Slice is not a 'replication technology'. Slice targets the imminent use case where (non-replicated) data is partitioned across many databases -- many large-scale, enterprise apps are employing database...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:57:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:57:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:57:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pinaki Poddar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: works across WAN?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If the database slices are accessible and operable over WAN via JDBC, then Slice will work. At least Slice will not introduce any more restriction than what OpenJPA in terms of database accessibility....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:46:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:46:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:46:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pinaki Poddar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Two-phase commit is a bottleneck</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The problem with all of these replication technologies is that it's not even close to achieving linear scalability.  Yes, I know there is no such thing as linear scalability, but with 2PC, the limit is quickly reached where performance really suffers....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:45:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>works across WAN?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I wonder if it will work across WAN...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:10:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:10:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:10:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Imber</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Looks similar to Hibernate Shards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Slice is inspired by Hibernate Shards. I will leave comparison to users :)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:11:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:11:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:11:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pinaki Poddar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Looks similar to Hibernate Shards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[At first glance, it looks very similar to the Hibernate Shards project donated to Hibernate by Google -- <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.hibernate.org/414.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.hibernate.org/414.html</a>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:01:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:01:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:01:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jim Bethancourt</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Slice: OpenJPA for distributed persistence</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48000</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Very interesting... I will certainly look at it. 

Thanks!
Nikita Ivanov.
<a href="http://www.gridgain.org">GridGain - Grid Computing Made Simple</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:46:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:46:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:46:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nikita Ivanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

