<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Desiderata Releases Jaxcent (Java AJAX) for the Internet</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:24:28 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: It looks like the contest of Ajax framework.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So I'm wondering how about Echo2 in your opinion. I've worked on Echo2 for one year but there're always the performance problem even after I refactored my code again and again. Is it worthy to refactor it again or just change to GWT?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:13:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:13:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:13:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mukesh Prasad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It looks like the contest of Ajax framework.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[So I'm wondering how about Echo2 in your opinion. I've worked on Echo2 for one year but there're always the performance problem even after I refactored my code again and again. Is it worthy to refactor it again or just change to GWT? TIA!]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:33:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:33:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:33:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Wing Light</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Desiderata Releases Jaxcent (Java AJAX) for the Internet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Jaxcent seems a minimalist version of <a href="http://www.itsnat.org">ItsNat</a> :)<br><br>Marko Grönroos: "DOM and HTML generally are really low-level client-side stuff and should, in my opinion, be abstracted away from the server-side API....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:22:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:22:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:22:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 19, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mukesh Prasad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Desiderata Releases Jaxcent (Java AJAX) for the Internet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jaxcent seems a minimalist version of <a href="http://www.itsnat.org">ItsNat</a> :)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:47:24 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use before judge</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[ZUML is an option. With ZK, you can choice whatever you want: by a markup language, by program, by JSF components, by JSP tags...

I don't like to jump to the fight. After all, the more competition the better for developers.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:58:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:58:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:58:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Fabrice Mustier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JavaScript size</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Looking at Jaxcent, however, it's js engine seems to be about 66kB, which is bigger than I would expect.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:37:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:37:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:37:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mukesh Prasad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Ease of use?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So, I would like to hear some arguments for the purpose of Jaxcent. In what sort of applications is it expected to be better than existing frameworks? </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:15:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:15:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:15:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mukesh Prasad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The server-centric Ajax solution seems become popular</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IT Mill Toolkit itself is very mature and has been used extensively in many client projects for years. The new generation, Release 5, which has a new GWT-based client-side engine, is still in beta phase. If maturity is your primary concern, you could use...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:26:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:26:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:26:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marko Gr??nroos</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The server-centric Ajax solution seems become popular</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IT Mill seems not very mature (I didn't try Jaxcent yet). If you prefer the server-centric Ajax solution, I'd suggest ZK. Complete and powerful yet intuitive and simple. Of course, I might be a bit bias after using it for almost one year.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:41:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:41:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:41:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Fabrice Mustier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A bit too thin framework</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Server-side Ajax frameworks are, in my (possibly biased) opinion, a very important development. Having taken a peek at Jaxcent, it seems to have the client-side rather thin. DOM and HTML generally are really low-level client-side stuff and should, in my...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marko Gr??nroos</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Desiderata Releases Jaxcent (Java AJAX) for the Internet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48128</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jaxcent from Desiderata Software is a Java API for accessing and modifying the Document Object Model (DOM) of the browser. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:30:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mukesh Prasad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

