<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:02:03 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Being Done</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I believe Websphere will handle method calls to EJBObjects with PBR if it recognizes that the caller and EJBObject are in the same JVM.<br><br>This is super, but when moves from unpartitioned development into partitioned production the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:26:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:26:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:26:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Randy  Schnier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Being Done</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I believe Websphere will handle method calls to EJBObjects with PBR if it recognizes that the caller and EJBObject are in the same JVM....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:25:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:25:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:25:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jon Kofal</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Local interfaces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>+1...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:18:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:18:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:18:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Onno Kluyt</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Local interfaces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Let the container find out "how the sysadmin partitioned the app" locate the needed resource and inject it where I have put an annotation. If the JEE would shine as a platform it should ease the devs pain, and be productive in the managers...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:57:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:57:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:57:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Randy  Schnier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Openness</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Is there a solution? </blockquote><br>For start they could make JCP EG discussions public. This would be a useful step in people actually seeing *who* objects to particular features, and associated vested interests...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:32:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:32:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:32:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jim Bethancourt</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Openness</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Is there a solution? </blockquote><br>For start they could make JCP EG discussions public. This would be a useful step in people actually seeing *who* objects to particular features, and associated vested interests against...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:25:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:25:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:25:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Local interfaces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If the JEE would shine as a platform it should ease the devs pain, and be productive in the managers eyes.<br>declarative programming++<br>visual tooling++<br>esoteric sorcery--<br><br>Regards<br>Daoud AbdelMonem Faleh.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:18:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:18:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:18:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Local interfaces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Most people who watch the JCP can find specifications that were weakened by...the inclusion of features meant to ease requirements for JSR participants (such as the local interfaces for EJBs in EJB 2.)</blockquote>A...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:41:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:41:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:41:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daoud Abdelmonem Faleh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Local interfaces</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Most people who watch the JCP can find specifications that were weakened by...the inclusion of features meant to ease requirements for JSR participants (such as the local interfaces for EJBs in EJB 2.)</blockquote>A little history...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:39:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:39:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:39:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Randy  Schnier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Expert group members can make a good start by blogging about what is going on within committee</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:50:18 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:50:18 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:50:18 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>please explain your Local interfaces comment</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A little history lesson.  Remote interfaces had RMI baggage.  Local interfaces were supposed to provide a local, collocated way to invoke....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:18:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:18:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:18:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Amen...enough said...<br><br>There is no reason to continue to hide what goes on behind the expert groups. It simply causes credibility gaps and gives expert group members a false sense of security. We should be ready to do what we do under a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:16:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:16:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:16:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Amen...enough said......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:04:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:04:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:04:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This has long been a problem within the JCP - <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.loopfuse.org/blog/?p=11" target="_newWindow">http://www.loopfuse.org/blog/?p=11</a>

Is getting better, but still has a ways to go.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:03:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:03:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:03:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Elrod</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Devil's Advocate for the JCP, of all things...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48145</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Is there a solution? </blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:24:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:24:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:24:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Persistability Ltd</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

