Support Forums: Message List - WSO2: release candidate of Web Services Framework for Spring http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:13 -0400 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320
Don't use WSDL 2.0 for REST. It's an ugly way of doing RESTful services IMNSHO.

Did you mean to see this because its kind of a contract first approach for REST (I know that the REST guys dont beleive in...]]> Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:25:36 -0500 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:25:36 -0500 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:25:36 -0500 Feb 8, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320
Don't use WSDL 2.0 for REST. It's an ugly way of doing RESTful services IMNSHO.

Did you mean to see this because its kind of a contract first approach for REST (I know that the REST guys dont beleive in contracts,...]]> Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:55:27 -0500 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:55:27 -0500 Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:55:27 -0500 Feb 8, 2008 Dan Diephouse 1 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 I'm not looking to 'do' REST with WSDL 2.0, I'm just looking for a way to specify the interface in a standardized way. I don't know of any other standards for this.
...]]> Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:22:15 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:22:15 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:22:15 -0500 Feb 7, 2008 Anthony Goubard 0 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 One is message based and one is resource based. You're going to have to design your service differently as they're two completely different beasts.

Use the best tool for the job. You'll save yourself time and a lot of...]]> Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:43:50 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:43:50 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:43:50 -0500 Feb 7, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: WSO2: release candidate of Web Services Framework for Spring http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:33:40 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:33:40 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:33:40 -0500 Feb 7, 2008 Ashok Madhavan 0 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320
What? Really? That's way stupid.

Agreed 100%, but thats the truth. REST guys do not like contracts. While developing WSDL 2.0 support in Axis2 we wanted to show that it can interop with existing REST services,...]]> Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:22:12 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:22:12 -0500 Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:22:12 -0500 Feb 7, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 What? Really? That's way stupid....]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:07:09 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:07:09 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:07:09 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 keith chapman 1 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 I'm not looking to 'do' REST with WSDL 2.0, I'm just looking for a way to specify the interface in a standardized way. I don't know of any other standards for this....]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:01:39 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:01:39 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:01:39 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 keith chapman 0 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 I know that the REST guys dont beleive in contracts What? Really? That's way stupid.]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:50:12 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:50:12 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:50:12 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 James Watson 2 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320
Personally I would like to see a good open source framework for REST based web services. I'm not sure if it's the way to go but WSDL 2.0 spec should theoretically support REST. I'm unaware of any tools that help with creating...]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:47:47 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:47:47 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:47:47 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 James Watson 2 Re: REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 Don't use WSDL 2.0 for REST. It's an ugly way of doing RESTful services IMNSHO.
...]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:24:57 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:24:57 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:24:57 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 keith chapman 5 REST, WSDL 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 Personally I would like to see a good open source framework for REST based web services. I'm not sure if it's the way to go but WSDL 2.0 spec should theoretically support REST. I'm unaware of any tools that help with creating these types...]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:28 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:28 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:46:28 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 Dan Diephouse 10 Databindings http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 In the WS development context, is there any WS framework that supports XStream binding out of the box and in "native" way as Cxf does Jaxb?...]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:34:52 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:34:52 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:34:52 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 Dan Diephouse 0 Re: suck? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:27 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:27 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:29:27 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 Artur Karazniewicz 0 Re: suck? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48320 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:27:26 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:27:26 -0500 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:27:26 -0500 Feb 6, 2008 James Watson 1