<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:17:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I tend to agree with the basic premise of the blog post.  Keeping things simply is good where JVM tuning in concerned, and I have seen many options used, and most of the time they make things worse.  One thing that I have learned recently, is that a lot...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:23:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:23:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:23:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andrig Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: There's a sort of dead horse here, but it needs to be beaten</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Joseph, for what it's worth, you have my full support....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:17:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:17:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:17:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 19, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Laurent Cohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: There's a sort of dead horse here, but it needs to be beaten</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm not going to argue that point - hey, if you're offerin', I'll be glad to forward your name to my employers. I'm sure you - or perhaps drunken lab rats - could do better.<br><br>I just wonder about the motivation and reasoning. I'm...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:51:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:51:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:51:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 19, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>d taye</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Keep up the good job</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I like TSS the way it is, InfoQ aint competition. Just look at the list of InfoQ Java topics, very low quality, with almost zero discussion....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:01:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:01:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:01:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Afu Ra</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>There's a sort of dead horse here, but it needs to be beaten</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Mr. Ottinger, dude, you're taking this personally. For the record, I have no problem with Kirk, I like his javaperformancetuning.com website, and I don't mean to attack him. But dude, my problem is how you've been running this site, why has...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:45:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:45:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:45:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TheServerSide vs. InfoQ</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just butting in with my $0.02 CDN......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:31:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:31:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:31:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dave Rooney</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Mr. Ottinger, dude, you're taking this personally.</blockquote>No, I'm not. You presented a query; I answered it. That's not "taking it personally," that's "justifying the decision."<blockquote>For the record, I have no problem with Kirk, I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:06:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:06:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:06:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>reads like it was written for 1.3.1, ever heard of cms, pargc?<blockquote>What every GC problems I've faced, I've found that I've rarely needed to set anything other than max memory and the survivor ratio</blockquote>ever tried...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:18:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:18:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:18:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>d taye</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>reads like it was written for 1.3.1, ever heard of cms, pargc?<blockquote>What every GC problems I've faced, I've found that I've rarely needed to set anything other than max memory and the survivor...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:52:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:52:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:52:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>d taye</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Maybe I should talk about applying database wait based approaches to Java performance management</blockquote>In fact Joe, can you free up budget and get this one scheduled?</blockquote>You betcha. William, email, dude.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>reads like it was written for 1.3.1, ever heard of cms, pargc?<blockquote>What every GC problems I've faced, I've found that I've rarely needed to set anything other than max memory and the survivor ratio</blockquote>ever tried...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:14:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:14:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:14:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kirk Pepperdine</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi,<br><br>Vendors performing a benchmark have much more time to twiddle around with settings, have a fixed application code base to work with, can accurately simulate the real-world load (it is a benchmark!) and have a much greater reward...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:51:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:51:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:51:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kirk Pepperdine</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Maybe I should talk about applying database wait based approaches to Java performance management</blockquote>

In fact Joe, can you free up budget and get this one scheduled?

Kirk]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:47:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:47:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:47:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kirk Pepperdine</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Maybe I should talk about applying database wait based approaches to Java performance management</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:45:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:45:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:45:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kirk Pepperdine</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sure, but what if we like twiddling knobs?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48426</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am mortally wounded Joseph. I thought I was alone but now I realized I am not even on the list or within the click. Maybe I should talk about applying database wait based approaches to Java performance management or how cheap object allocation is, ;-).]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:31:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:31:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:31:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

