<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Looking for a few good WSDLs</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:17:50 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I agree on your assumption that all basic operations can be translated on their CRUD equivalent. Who wouldn't ?! But these are *basic* operations. I could think of a gazillion scenarios where you'll end up making arbitrary mappings between...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:20:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:20:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:20:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 1, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I use a document/literal style and I import the schema I use into the WSDL.  The schema is in a library of schemas that define our common data types and structures in a standard way that can be used where ever we use XML (or something that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:04:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:04:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:04:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 1, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In this case there is no need for WSDL indeed.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:37:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:37:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:37:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I use “Object getObject(Object)” analogy because this type of interface tells nothing about its abilities: it does not tell if it can adopt and take any type or only certain subtypes, it doe not tell what it could return back, it does not guarantee that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Let me try and understand what you are saying.  When you write “Object getObject(Object)” is Object the top of the class hierarchy as in Java?  If so then are you saying it is untyped because you can either adapt to any type (e.g. polymorphism) or you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:01:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:01:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:01:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...I can also explicitly type RESTful services.  All I have to do is send an XML document that references the schema that defines its structure.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:21:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:21:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:21:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:</blockquote><br>SOAP document/literal is not RPC.  It is not necessarily statically typed either.  It defines a message structure associated with a service operation....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:58:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:58:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:58:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:</blockquote><br>SOAP document/literal is not RPC.  It is not necessarily statically typed either.  It defines a message structure associated with a service operation....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:56:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:56:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:56:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Benz Town Citizen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:<br>RESTfull<br><br>Object get(String);<br>Status put(Object);<br>Status delete(String);<br>Status post( Object);<br><br><br>Statically typed (CORBA, SOAP, RMI, various RPC so to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:47:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:47:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:47:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Benz Town Citizen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:</blockquote><br>SOAP document/literal is not RPC.  It is not necessarily statically typed either.  It defines a message structure associated with a service operation....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:34:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:34:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:34:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:16:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:16:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:16:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Guys, it is very simple, there are two APIs styles:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: But what about non HTTP transfer</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:29:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:29:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:29:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lars Borup Jensen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>I don't understand this. What do you mean specifically? HTTP supports a set of capabilities equivalent to CRUD which have been proven to be all you need long ago.</blockquote><br><br>If you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:38:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:38:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:38:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ian Hlavats</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: The best WSDL is no WSDL at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48534</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>I don't understand this. What do you mean specifically? HTTP supports a set of capabilities equivalent to CRUD which have been proven to be all you need long ago.</blockquote><br><br>If you really can't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:54:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:54:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:54:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Luc Boudreau</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

