<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - STAN - Structure Analysis for Java, 1.0 released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:01:11 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>competition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Christoph,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:00:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:00:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 05:00:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian Sell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>STAN License</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This thread has gotten out of hand and should have been focused on STAN but I want to thank Cristoph for taking the time to work with me to accommodate my situation.  He's spent a great deal of time (outside of this thread) to do so.  If you're a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:15:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:15:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:15:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marc Stock</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Clarification on DSMs and Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks for your clarifications.
<blockquote>I would urge people to try your product out.</blockquote>
Good to hear!]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:01:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:01:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:01:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Clarification on DSMs and Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There are a few misconceptions about DSMs and Lattix that I want to clarify ......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:57:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:57:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:57:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Neeraj Sangal</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This seems to be turning into a wonderful discussion on matrix computations! Strange, but no single user asked for dependency matrices... Btw, 'simplifying' may have been more appropriate than 'simplistic'....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:16:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:16:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:16:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I totally agree that a traditional nodes-and-edges dependency graph is way more intuitive to understand than a matrix. And that a well organized code-base will not have dependency graphs that are too big to be understood ("mind-sized chunks"). I also...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:27:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:27:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:27:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Chedgey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: License doesn't work for consultants</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Christoph, if I was advertizing Structure101 features, the post would have been much longer :-). Given that Marc had posted his impression that Structure101 licensing does not work for consultants, my correction was perfectly reasonable. And you are more...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:07:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:07:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:07:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Chedgey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes, a DSM matrix is space efficient, but that's it. However, you won't find these clumsy graphs in a well designed system. With STAN, visual dependency analysis is seamlessly integrated into the IDE, so developers use it continuously and will naturally...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:39:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:39:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:39:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: License doesn't work for consultants</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Chris, this thread is about STAN 1.0 and it's not meant to be a platform for s101 ads. You can be sure that I would have never posted a similar message to a thread about your product.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:15:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:15:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:15:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[DSM matrixes have their place. That is really big graphs that are simply impossible to read as a diagram. <a href="http://www.headwaysoftware.com">Structure101</a> lets you display dependency graphs as either a diagram or a matrix. It also lets you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:57:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:57:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:57:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Chedgey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: License doesn't work for consultants</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Marc, Structure101 (<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.headwaysoftware.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.headwaysoftware.com</a>) is used a lot by many consultants. In fact we give discounts to consultants because we like that you get the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:46:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:46:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:46:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Chedgey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Find and Grep</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I surrender...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:34:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:34:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:34:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes, I "checked it out"... Aside from "scales really well" and "easy to use", do you think that representing any dependency graph as a numerical matrix is particularly suitable to support humans in their conception of the underlying relations? Check out...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:28:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:28:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:28:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christoph Beck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Find and Grep</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I just did some structure analysis on my application: to be more precise I wanted to know the dependencies of a package within the application I am writing. I simply used 'find' and 'grep'. This tool seems quite nice and interesting (the others that are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:16:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:16:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:16:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 3, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ivo Limmen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Check out Lattix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48926</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The one I prefer is called Lattix LDM (<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.lattix.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.lattix.com</a>). It scales really well and is easy to use. It analyzes not just Java but also configuration files such as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:47:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:47:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:47:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 2, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Scott Callaghan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

