Support Forums: Message List - Why should you combine Reliable Messaging with Dist. Caching? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Tue, 21 May 2013 22:34:59 -0400 Re: Deliberate plug for a product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:09:51 -0400 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:09:51 -0400 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:09:51 -0400 Aug 8, 2008 Sanjay Garde 0 Useless discussion http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:55:17 -0400 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:55:17 -0400 Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:55:17 -0400 Jun 27, 2008 Abhay Bhanushali 0 Re: Deliberate plug for a product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 This article is appropriate in the marketing collateral for Gemstone, not as a pattern here. I can't understand why distributed caching is a panacea for every performance issue . . . Caching is an important tool to provide performant systems...]]> Sat, 10 May 2008 18:28:43 -0400 Sat, 10 May 2008 18:28:43 -0400 Sat, 10 May 2008 18:28:43 -0400 May 10, 2008 Gideon Low 1 Re: JMS + JavaSpaces? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Sat, 10 May 2008 17:57:35 -0400 Sat, 10 May 2008 17:57:35 -0400 Sat, 10 May 2008 17:57:35 -0400 May 10, 2008 Gideon Low 0 Deliberate plug for a product http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Thu, 08 May 2008 22:40:31 -0400 Thu, 08 May 2008 22:40:31 -0400 Thu, 08 May 2008 22:40:31 -0400 May 8, 2008 Sunil n Abinash - 2 Re: Doesn't this introduce coupling between services? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 My assertion is that this is a badly designed system at a fairly fundamental level. The situations in which MOM integration are appropriate are (by and large) different from those where deeply shared state is appropriate.

This is why...]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 16:34:16 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 16:34:16 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 16:34:16 -0400 May 6, 2008 S. Yayla 0 Re: Doesn't this introduce coupling between services? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:56:42 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:56:42 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:56:42 -0400 May 6, 2008 CriticalArchitect 1 Re: Doesn't this introduce coupling between services? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 "several closely cooperating applications"

The state info is not "purely internal to itself"....]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 07:31:39 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:31:39 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:31:39 -0400 May 6, 2008 S. Yayla 2 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 That said, the focus for this article are all the cases where several distributed services (or call them components or "closely cooperating apps"), all access and use the same underlying database sharing data and events. Services communicate...]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 04:44:13 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 04:44:13 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 04:44:13 -0400 May 6, 2008 CriticalArchitect 0 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Before you had mentioned that one of the core tenets of SOA was that services should be independent. I understand the principle, I think, but I struggle with how this would be implemented in practice in situations like the...]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 04:36:09 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 04:36:09 -0400 Tue, 06 May 2008 04:36:09 -0400 May 6, 2008 CriticalArchitect 0 It serves it's purpose in the given probem context http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:54:24 -0400 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:54:24 -0400 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:54:24 -0400 May 3, 2008 Sunil n Abinash - 0 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207
Within a single application, using a distributed cache across a cluster to get better scalability is a very sensible approach. And there's obviously nothing wrong with combining data from external events with existing data.

What I...]]> Sat, 03 May 2008 11:07:03 -0400 Sat, 03 May 2008 11:07:03 -0400 Sat, 03 May 2008 11:07:03 -0400 May 3, 2008 Jags Ramnarayan 1 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207
I want to understand your point here. Let say I have the operations, "place order", "cancel order" and "track order". Clearly these will need to share at least some state. Do you think these one service or multiple...]]> Fri, 02 May 2008 16:44:25 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 16:44:25 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 16:44:25 -0400 May 2, 2008 James Watson 1 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 Fri, 02 May 2008 14:03:20 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 14:03:20 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 14:03:20 -0400 May 2, 2008 Mike Stolz 0 Re: distributed data good, but what about throughput? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49207 I want to understand your point here. Let say I have the operations, "place order", "cancel order" and "track order". Clearly these will need to share at least some state. Do you think these one service or multiple services?
...]]> Fri, 02 May 2008 12:01:48 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 12:01:48 -0400 Fri, 02 May 2008 12:01:48 -0400 May 2, 2008 CriticalArchitect 2