<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JSR-315 needs YOU for servlet 3.0</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:59:09 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>More problems..</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The main problem (IMHO) isn't that Servlet is going to introduce auto-discovery of Servlets. The main reason I don't think its a big deal is because you can turn it of using one line of XML in the web.xml....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:56:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:56:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:56:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Roy van Rijn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>so there's really nothing at all to scream about at this point.</blockquote>
agreed... we can scream on the eg mailing list. :-)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:27:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:27:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:27:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maxim Moldenhauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I disagree. The end result is the same. Servlets exposed you don't want exposed.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:03:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:03:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:03:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remy Maucherat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>This is analogous to the security problems that were experienced with the invoker style, where /servlet/com.acme.SomeServlet would invoke the servlet even if it was not listed in the web.xml.    These features bring back that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:47:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:47:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:47:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maxim Moldenhauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This is analogous to the security problems that were experienced with the invoker style, where /servlet/com.acme.SomeServlet would invoke the servlet even if it was not listed in the web.xml.    These features bring back that issue, that a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:00:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:00:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:00:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remy Maucherat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In practice, if you are deploying unknown, malicious code into your app server intentionally (which is what it would take for this to actually be a security problem) then you have bigger problems.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:30:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:30:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:30:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gregw</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Bill,<br><br><blockquote>I think the security issue is bogus IMO.<br>1) If this is a security hole, then EJB is also one big security hole as it allows this sort of deployment.<br></blockquote><br><br>The ejb security scenario is quite...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:53:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:53:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:53:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jesse Sightler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Controlled flexibility</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>That automagical mode might be interesting for lazy developers... true. <br>BUT in order to remain acceptable in the corporate (aka Fortune 500) world it must be possible to impose strictly controlled behaviour. Those corporate...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:03:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:03:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:03:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maxim Moldenhauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Stop adding useless crap</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[These low-level features are being worked on as well.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:58:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:58:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:58:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maxim Moldenhauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make Java share hosting friendly</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with the poster that said frameworks handle all the concerns regarding ease of use nowadays. All I really care about is for Java becoming a more viable solution for shared hosting environment.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:44:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:44:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:44:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mschipperheyn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Controlled flexibility</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Just, PLEASE, leave a possibility to disable all those automatisms and give me complete control with the one and only web.xml. <br>LET THERE BE CHOICE!</blockquote>

+++++++]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:12:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:12:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:12:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hans Prueller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Does anyone really care?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sorry if I sound negative, but how many Java developers really and truly care about the Servlet specification any more?  I'd be willing to bet that 99% of Java developers don't care at all, because they are using a framework that handles all...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:23:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:23:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:23:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gregw</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Bill,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:53:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:53:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:53:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>janb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Stop adding useless crap</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Dear JSR-315. Please, stop adding useless crap to the spec....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:57:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:57:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:57:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Besogonov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Security issue is bogus</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49212</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We can selective automatic discovery by package that can be configured. This would prevent random 3rd party jars being loaded into the web container]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:35:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:35:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:35:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Srikanth Seshadri</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

