<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - The status of JBoss AS 5</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:54:26 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Don't be so selfish</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for sharing with us your 6th sense. <br><br>My 6th sense tells me many users won't know what to do with what your 6th sense tells you :)</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:31:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:31:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:31:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pedro Andres Solorzano</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>That sounds sane, but is it actually true? Can you point to research that supports your opinion?</blockquote><br><br>Nope, no research, my opinion is based on various business management sources such as books, blogs, and on my...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:55:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:55:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:55:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>That sounds sane, but is it actually true? Can you point to research that supports your opinion?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:52:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:52:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:52:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 9, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If there is no difference, or difference is minor in favor of non-standard solution, they will go for standard solution, though it is more expensive.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:47:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:47:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:47:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Also, many impressive tech companies (Google, Amazon) built their own software infrastructure, or at least important parts of it.</blockquote><br><br>The talk is about companies whose primary interest is not in IT, a.k.a....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:20:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:20:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:20:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Also, many impressive tech companies (Google, Amazon) built their own software infrastructure, or at least important parts of it.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:17:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:17:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:17:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saying a standard is &quot;less risk&quot; doesn't make it so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If you are referring to homegrown POJO solutions, I would say that these probably have less functionality and are more complex to deal with until the developers are familiar with a custom framework.<br><br>If a 'public' framework like Spring,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:21:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:21:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:21:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 7, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: misguided</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Any serious manager will always go for standard solutions, such as JEE, simply because it is less risk.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:13:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:13:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:13:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 7, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Frank and James</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Apologies, I have been sleeping for the past couple of days on this thread, and i didn't take the time to respond to the responses from u guys......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:28:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:28:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:28:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 6, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>douglas dooley</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saying a standard is &quot;less risk&quot; doesn't make it so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If anyone disagrees with you it means they have an ulterior motive. That's a really mature way to think about the world.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:55:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:55:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:55:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 5, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: nice work</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>b. OSGi and modularity<br><br>I honestly don't even understand this discussion, as I mentioned before referencing Muzilla's "re-factoring" discussions in the Register, so I can't comment on what it exactly mean to be "modular", but i don't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:45:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:45:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:45:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saying a standard is &quot;less risk&quot; doesn't make it so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>All I have to do to make my case is show one bad standard. You would have to show that all standards are good. </blockquote><br>Wrong again. One word: evolution of IT. If there were no EJB, there would be no Spring.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:57:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:57:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:57:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saying a standard is &quot;less risk&quot; doesn't make it so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>J2EE was never derived from global consensus and that's where it went wrong.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:17:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:17:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:17:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chief Thrall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saying a standard is &quot;less risk&quot; doesn't make it so</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Standard can be very good. They can also be very bad. Just because something is a standard doesn't mean it's a good choice. </blockquote><br><br>Well, we shall see about this part as well. If we keep an eye on new Spring's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:07:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:07:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:07:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's the major malfunction of Douglas Dooley?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49910</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[What exactly is wrong with his post? I did see some of yourother post and they are merely useless one-two liners wiht no real technical stuff in them. So what's YOUR major malfunction?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:10:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:10:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:10:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 4, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>AD aa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

