<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:42:39 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thats true. But getShortClassName() is available since 1.5. Probably the project mentioned is based on 1.4?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:47:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:47:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:47:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kumar Mettu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For example I now use it just for its ClassUtils.getShortClassName().</blockquote>
If that's the only reason, just use java.lang.Class#getSimpleName() and get rid of that dependency completely.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:39:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:39:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:39:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 1, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nils Kilden-Pedersen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not to use JBuilder's &quot;Application Factory&quot; mechanism?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Take a look at <a href="http://www.codegear.com/article/37882#1ApplicationFactories">"Application Factories"</a> in the new version of <a href="http://www.codegear.com/products/JBuilder">JBuilder</a>?
IMHO this is more powerful way for reuse of Java code.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:24:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:24:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:24:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pawel Glowacki</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I guess I'm talking more about things like the Jakarta Lang package which are similar to the Java Gems project in scope.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:05:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:05:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:05:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ioannis Cherouvim</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>@James: I feel that Commons FileUpload is irreplaceable. Isn't that the case?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:33:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:33:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:33:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 13, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[@James: I feel that Commons FileUpload is irreplaceable. Isn't that the case?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:00:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:00:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:00:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 13, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ioannis Cherouvim</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't really have a strong feeling about this project in particular.  As pointed out it above, it's a little thin but I think the idea is to get contributions at this point....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:22:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:22:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:22:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 13, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I thought I should not dignify your review by a reply, but here it goes....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:19:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:19:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:19:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 12, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dushyanth Inguva</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Cut and paste</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If you want some collaborative cut and paste try this :
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://gist.github.com/gists" target="_newWindow">http://gist.github.com/gists</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:25:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:25:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:25:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 12, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bruno Vernay</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: new project name</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Not quite going that far, but I agree with the "snippet" part. I was hoping to see, basically a bunch of code "gems" that don't need to be downloaded, per se, but rather, simply cut and pasted in to your project. Rather than downloading some class...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:08:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:08:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:08:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Instead of posting "stupid" questions just look at source code and post your review which will compare this project with jakarta commons. Maybe then this site will be much fun to read as it was back in 2001.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:35:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:35:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:35:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>new project name</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[When I think of "Gems", I think of any code snippet found on: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://thedailywtf.com" target="_newWindow">http://thedailywtf.com</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:02:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:02:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:02:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brandon India</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've got to play devil's advocate here and ask what, to me, is the obvious question: how is this different than any of the other projects out there like this?  What makes it better?  Why should I use it, and maybe more importantly, contribute to it?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:45:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:45:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:45:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fzammetti</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Initial version of the Java Gems project</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There's no need of being rude. 

Besides, you can apply your "advice" to yourself. Instead of insulting readers; make the review yourself and post it.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:01:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:01:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:01:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Agusti Sanchez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Pardon frickin me...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50308</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A bit of a harsh response I'd say. That wiki entry looks like it was only written today - possibly following the question re Jakarta Commons.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:57:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:57:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:57:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 11, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark Davidson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

