Support Forums: Message List - Does Spring violate JEE spec? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sat, 25 May 2013 14:15:14 -0400 Re: Class.forName()? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:47:00 -0400 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:47:00 -0400 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:47:00 -0400 Sep 3, 2008 Harangus Andrei 0 Re: Spring jobs claims http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:17:12 -0400 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:17:12 -0400 Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:17:12 -0400 Sep 3, 2008 douglas dooley 0 Re: Does Spring violate JEE spec? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Repeating two perspectives on this I have heard lately, one, that the divide between the framework/DSL (Domain Specific Language) provider and the user is bug not a feature, two, that components/libraries are much easier to design and evolve...]]> Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:46:17 -0400 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:46:17 -0400 Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:46:17 -0400 Sep 2, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Does Spring violate JEE spec? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 I agree completely at a conceptual level but I would refine it a little. The thing that has always bothered me about EJB (and any number of other 'trust the vendor' tools) wasn't so much that they limit what you can do in certain contexts...]]> Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:32:03 -0400 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:32:03 -0400 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:32:03 -0400 Sep 1, 2008 art src 1 Re: Agree and disagree http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 ...]]> Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:15:17 -0400 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:15:17 -0400 Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:15:17 -0400 Sep 1, 2008 art src 0 Re: EJB3 Session Beans http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477
The spec says that a Stateless Session Bean is not allowed to be a subclass of anything.

Just to clarify what the specs says:
The session bean class may have superclasses and/or...]]> Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:58:02 -0400 Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:58:02 -0400 Sun, 31 Aug 2008 23:58:02 -0400 Aug 31, 2008 Rajiv Narula 0 Does Spring violate JEE spec? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:44:25 -0400 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:44:25 -0400 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:44:25 -0400 Aug 29, 2008 Ethan Allen 0 Re: No. Should be "Does Spring rape EJB spec? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477
Wouldn't be more proper to say:

Does Spring rapes JEE spec?


No. Should be "Does Spring rape EJB spec?
Better yet, "Does Spring rape the EJB spec"?]]> Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:50:47 -0400 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:50:47 -0400 Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:50:47 -0400 Aug 29, 2008 arjan tijms 0 No. Should be "Does Spring rape EJB spec? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Wouldn't be more proper to say:

Does Spring rapes JEE spec? No. Should be "Does Spring rape EJB spec?]]> Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:11:36 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:11:36 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:11:36 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 George Jiang 1 Re: Class.forName() caching http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477
The problem with Class.forName() is that it has the side effect of caching the results. In some environments, the same classname may exist multiple times, such as in an OSGi environment.

This means that your...]]> Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:17 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:17 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:29:17 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Wow! One night over and tons of useless messages! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 As I read this post yesterday (without any comments) I asked myself I there would be some people having enough time to investigate - to write really useful and profounded answers. But all I found this morning is a boring and useless...]]> Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:12:08 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:12:08 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:12:08 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 James Watson 0 nothing to see here, move along sir... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:20:53 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:20:53 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:20:53 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 Chief Thrall 0 Re: Class.forName() caching http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477
The problem with Class.forName() is that it has the side effect of caching the results. In some environments, the same classname may exist multiple times, such as in an OSGi environment.

This means that your second call to...]]> Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:08:06 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:08:06 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:08:06 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 Allard Buijze 2 Wow! One night over and tons of useless messages! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:21:59 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:21:59 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:21:59 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 Marco Missfeldt 1 Evolution http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50477 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:29 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:29 -0400 Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:29 -0400 Aug 28, 2008 Amir Sedighi 0