Support Forums: Message List - Are All Stateful Web Applications Broken? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:13:27 -0400 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 I would say naming a class based on the underlying framework it depends on is way out-of-line...]]> Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:01:48 -0400 Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:01:48 -0400 Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:01:48 -0400 Oct 12, 2008 Eelco Hillenius 0 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:58:54 -0400 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:58:54 -0400 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:58:54 -0400 Oct 10, 2008 Taylor Gautier 0 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 I think we've talked this into the ground and I don't think I will convince you. Yep. At least we agree that naming classes and methods is something that should be taking seriously :-)]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:33:29 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:33:29 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:33:29 -0400 Oct 9, 2008 Eelco Hillenius 1 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 It's all arbitrary of course, like any naming is. I feel that naming is important, so I guess I have to backtrack and agree with you that this issue is important enough to keep bringing up :-) Look, the thing that really matters when you name...]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:38:35 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:38:35 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:38:35 -0400 Oct 9, 2008 James Watson 3 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Would you support prefixing all concrete types with 'C' or all abstract types with 'A' and perhaps we should add a second letter 'I' for inner, 'N' for nested, 'L' for local 'T' for top-level and then we can add 'PU' for public and 'PK' for...]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:32:39 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:32:39 -0400 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:32:39 -0400 Oct 9, 2008 Eelco Hillenius 4 Re: Are All Stateful Web Applications Broken? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Flash scope...Conversation scope...Flow scope Just because a framework allows a developer to avoid dealing directly with HttpSession or ServletContext, doesn't mean that it's solved the general issues presented in the article.]]> Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:32:38 -0400 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:32:38 -0400 Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:32:38 -0400 Oct 7, 2008 kschneid 0 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 It's either a matter of taste, or you think that many people, including yours truly, are plain wrong :-)...]]> Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:48:43 -0400 Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:48:43 -0400 Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:48:43 -0400 Oct 6, 2008 James Watson 5 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 I don't want to get into a fight or anything but I think that it's not just a matter of taste....]]> Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:04:29 -0400 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:04:29 -0400 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:04:29 -0400 Oct 3, 2008 Eelco Hillenius 6 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834
Of course, having to deal with every interface name starting with "I" is worse than any potential concurrency issue! ;-)


Kris - Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:48:31 -0400 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:48:31 -0400 Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:48:31 -0400 Oct 3, 2008 James Watson 7 Re: Are All Stateful Web Applications Broken? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:19:33 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:19:33 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:19:33 -0400 Oct 2, 2008 greg matthews 1 Re: Scoped services http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:14 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:14 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:25:14 -0400 Oct 2, 2008 Andy Gibson 0 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834
Of course, having to deal with every interface name starting with "I" is worse than any potential concurrency issue! ;-)


Kris - couldn't...]]> Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:07:04 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:07:04 -0400 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:07:04 -0400 Oct 2, 2008 Eelco Hillenius 8 Re: No problem with Wicket http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Of course, having to deal with every interface name starting with "I" is worse than any potential concurrency issue! ;-)
...]]> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:17:23 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:17:23 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:17:23 -0400 Oct 1, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Atomicity failure vs Visibility Failure http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 I don't see the difference between the definitions of atomicity failure and visibility failure as mentioned by the author.

" * An atomicity failure, where one thread is updating multiple data items and another thread reads the data...]]> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:14:14 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:14:14 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:14:14 -0400 Oct 1, 2008 James Watson 0 Atomicity failure vs Visibility Failure http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50834 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:00:01 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:00:01 -0400 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:00:01 -0400 Oct 1, 2008 Adeel Ali 1