<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Dependency injection with Guice</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:47:15 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Hmmm... looks like I was wrong ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Is it feasible to use Guice without using field based injection?  What are the cases you find you need to use field-based injection?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:39:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:39:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:39:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Hmmm... looks like I was wrong ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Looks like I was wrong WRT Bob's preference...</blockquote><br><br>I strongly prefer constructor injection. That's actually one of the primary reasons I created Guice (other frameworks didn't handle it well).<br><br>In the rare...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:21:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:21:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:21:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 17, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Hmmm... looks like I was wrong ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Looks like I was wrong WRT Bob's preference...</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:54:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:54:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:54:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>9.1.1 Post-Construction Modification of Final Fields</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[And here it is......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:04:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:04:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:04:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rob bygrave</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hmmm... looks like I was wrong ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Looks like I was wrong WRT Bob's preference......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:55:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:55:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:55:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rob bygrave</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Constructors are preferred (by me anyway)</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, I for one would prefer using the Constructor over @Inject on the fields (and I'm pretty sure I read somewhere Bob Lee has this preference as well)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:17:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:17:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:17:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rob bygrave</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Hopefully this explains why we have never been convinced there's an actual problem here.</blockquote><br><br>The size of the JAR is not an issue. The issue is that the JAR file exists and is needed.<br><br>The problem is the Guice...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:38:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:38:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:38:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hopefully this explains why we have never been convinced there's an actual problem here.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:10:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:10:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:10:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Torben Putkonen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have never used this technology but <b>WHY</b> use annotations when you have to write classes like this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:56:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:56:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:56:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 16, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marc de Kwant</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>"Some engineers dislike the idea of adding an @Inject to their class. They prefer that a class be totally ignorant of the DI framework. This is a reasonable point, but I'm not convinced by it. As dependencies go, an annotation is pretty mild....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:04:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:04:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:04:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mathieu Carbou</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>After the annotation is added, it is no longer possible to compile the code without Guice.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:55:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:55:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:55:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexander Panzhin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How many people are using it?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AppsThatUseGuice" target="_newWindow">http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AppsThatUseGuice</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:08:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How many people are using it?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just wondering, if you have any information on that subject.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:25:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:25:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:25:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Zviki Cohen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi, Will. Kevin B. recently answered this question on the Guice mailing list (<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/browse_thread/thread/323cc1f4e6b074e5"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:24:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:24:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:24:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Article tries to downplay effects of annotation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52252</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Use the Context IoC design pattern. I have been using it since Java 1.3 and works great....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:17:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:17:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:17:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 15, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sony Mathew</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

