Support Forums: Message List - Servlet 3.0 Public Review http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 19 May 2013 16:44:38 -0400 make it simple http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:45:55 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:45:55 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:45:55 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 nn 0 Re: Servlet 3.0 Public Review http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:55:53 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:55:53 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:55:53 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Daoud Abdelmonem Faleh 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:48:07 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:48:07 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:48:07 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Niall Gallagher 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Well just Servlet API build on top of Simple API. So you can use Servlets with as well as the foundation framework, which has asynchronous capabilities.

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:39:02 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:39:02 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:39:02 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 1 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:18:10 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:18:10 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:18:10 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Niall Gallagher 2 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 If you read a little closer you will see that I have written a Servlet Adaptation Layer based on 2.5. Use that if you want to leverage existing component frameworks.> Can you point me to exactly what you are referring to? I'm...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:05:26 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:05:26 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:05:26 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 3 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Hi,


the are multiple asynchronous concerns at play here. The ones you are talking about are asynchronous IO concerns, ie how to avoid blocking while reading requests and writing responses.


No,...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:34:38 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:34:38 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:34:38 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Guido Anzuoni 0 Re: Complete disaster http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 James

+1

In the many JEE projects I have worked on I have
not seen a practical JEE role-based security impl.

While URL patterns are a great top-level application
of security roles/privs there are also the lower...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:14:51 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:14:51 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:14:51 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 James Watson 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445
How do you use existing content generation frameworks with Simple? If it can't do that, its insufficient.

Just make a classic request-response model on top of it. Or Servlet3-style resume/suspend...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:04:25 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:04:25 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:04:25 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:37 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:37 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:00:37 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Niall Gallagher 4 Re: Complete disaster http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Currently my web.xml file is just 23 lines, last modified more than a year ago. And that's not an unusual situation. However, bloated spec will (probably) require more bloated container.Instead of completely bashing the idea and...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:59:35 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:59:35 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:59:35 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 How do you use existing content generation frameworks with Simple? If it can't do that, its insufficient....]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:23 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:23 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:23 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Alex Besogonov 1 Re: Servlet 3.0 Public Review http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 This spec is surely something worthless. This is not very constructive feedback.]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:53:36 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:53:36 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:53:36 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 0 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445

No, absolutely not. I am talking about exactly the same thing. I am talking about asynchronous behaviour as it relates to the service model. The service model Simple uses does not couple request completion to the servicing thread. It...]]> Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:39:23 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:39:23 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:39:23 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 Maxim Moldenhauer 7 Re: Asynchornous HTTP done properly http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=52445 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:13 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:13 -0500 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:55:13 -0500 Dec 18, 2008 gregw 0