http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:38:43 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:13:00 -0500 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:13:00 -0500 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:13:00 -0500 Feb 18, 2009 Reza Rahman 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Sorry if this did not correctly represent your current levels of involvement/support. The intent was to give credit where it was due. No need to apologize! I just didn't want to take credit where it isn't due. :-) Bob]]> Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:00:18 -0500 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:00:18 -0500 Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:00:18 -0500 Feb 18, 2009 Bob Lee 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:46:12 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:46:12 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:46:12 -0500 Feb 17, 2009 Reza Rahman 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:12:46 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:12:46 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:12:46 -0500 Feb 17, 2009 Mark Fisher 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:28:42 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:28:42 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:28:42 -0500 Feb 17, 2009 Reza Rahman 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 In my opinion, the component model should be such that the developer never needs to worry about thread-safety, whatever API he/she chooses to use....]]> Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:26:41 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:26:41 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:26:41 -0500 Feb 17, 2009 Mark Fisher 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:41:08 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:41:08 -0500 Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:41:08 -0500 Feb 17, 2009 Reza Rahman 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 This is actually one reason to implement EJB definitions as pools of instances assigned to client threads on demand. This means that EJB bean implementations need not worry about any instance variables being thread-safe *at all*....]]> Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:50:23 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:50:23 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:50:23 -0500 Feb 16, 2009 Mark Fisher 5 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:46 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:46 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:46 -0500 Feb 16, 2009 Reza Rahman 6 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 With respect, it's not really that simple. You'd have to make sure all of your instance variables are thread-safe - EJB means you don't worry about that at all. For example, the Hiberate session you mention and well as the JPA EntityManager...]]> Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:04:29 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:04:29 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:04:29 -0500 Feb 16, 2009 Mark Fisher 7 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:10:16 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:10:16 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:10:16 -0500 Feb 16, 2009 Reza Rahman 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:24:38 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:24:38 -0500 Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:24:38 -0500 Feb 16, 2009 Bob Lee 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:24:38 -0500 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:24:38 -0500 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:24:38 -0500 Feb 13, 2009 Reza Rahman 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:18:09 -0500 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:18:09 -0500 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:18:09 -0500 Feb 13, 2009 Erik Bergersjo 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53459 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:13:01 -0500 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:13:01 -0500 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:13:01 -0500 Feb 11, 2009 Reza Rahman 2