<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - db4o releases Object Manager to the open source community</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:02:47 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>:)</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[i so agree with you
<a href="http://www.colemanworks.net/search-engine-optimization/">buffalo ny SEO</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:15:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:15:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:15:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 23, 2013</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mattcoleman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>compatible</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[db4o release was significant
<a href="http://www.storkclub.com/the-stork-club-movie-clip1.html">stork club movie</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:57:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:57:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:57:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2013</jf:date>
        <jf:author>club stork</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OM and db4o license</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If you check the <a href="http://developer.db4o.com/blogs/community/archive/2009/02/05/object-manager-vs-object-manager-enterprise-feature-comparison.aspxv">feature comparison of OM and OME</a> you'll see that OM uses a SQL based interface...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:11:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:11:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:11:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 8, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pavel Lahoda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: neodatis vs db4o benchmarks !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Anyway, it is nice to have NeoDatis remembered when talking about Object database....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:29:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:29:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:29:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 5, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>olivier smadja</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: neodatis vs db4o benchmarks !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Referential integrity is a very important feature that we will implement in version 2. I was wondering if Db4O already supports it?<br><br>Anyway, DB4O is a very good product. And offering the Object Manager Enterprise (for free) with the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:58:18 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:58:18 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:58:18 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gerps1</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OM and db4o license</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks for information on Object Manager, this is definitely a step in the right direction. I would love if there is a SQL based interface, so you can look at your objects as a data stored in tables, thus you get the best of both worlds. Hope...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:50:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:50:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:50:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gerps1</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: neodatis vs db4o benchmarks !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>hummm, interesting about these "Current limits", but I guess some of that, are also limits on db4o, as "bulk operations are missing (multiple updates and deletes) and online backup/restore". But I'm not sure, maybe somebody can tell...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:12:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:12:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:12:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gerps1</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: db4o releases Object Manager to the open source community</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Congrats on the release German et al!<br>Is there a feature comparison of the old ObjectManager (already open sourced, Gisbert was writing it last I heard) and the new (enterprise) ObjectManager ?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:20:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:20:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:20:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gerps1</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OM and db4o license</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I can see some need of looking at objects as tuples, but to say that's the best of both worlds?  The whole point of an object database is to get rid of the impedance mismatch that such a configuration causes.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:22:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:22:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:22:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pavel Lahoda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: neodatis vs db4o benchmarks !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Olivier, thanks for your prompt reply....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:51:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:51:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:51:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>andrea costantinis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: -1 for GPL dual licensing for OO databases</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Dominique, all......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:02:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:02:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:02:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Greene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: db4o releases Object Manager to the open source community</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks Andi.....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:14:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:14:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:14:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Greene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>-1 for GPL dual licensing for OO databases</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IMHO, you can NOT be :...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:14:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:14:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:14:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dominique  De Vito</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OM and db4o license</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I can see some need of looking at objects as tuples, but to say that's the best of both worlds?  The whole point of an object database is to get rid of the impedance mismatch that such a configuration causes.  Your proposal is creating a reverse ORM...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:11:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:11:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:11:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>One of possible licensing model and accompanying business model</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53461</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One of possible licensing model and accompanying business model for db4o can licensing core db in LGPL and build propriety extensions or add-ons and premium support packages......wondering what German(db4o) has to say about possibility of the same in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:34:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:34:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:34:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>pagux pagux</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

